Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday August 03 2016, @01:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the Pokémon-Go-Away! dept.

Niantic faces a class action lawsuit for encouraging trespassing on private property:

When Niantic released Pokemon Go, it randomly placed Pokémon, Pokéstops and Pokémon Gyms all over the world. Players of the game wander the real world and use smartphones to capture Pokemon, buy items and fight Pokemon Gym leaders.

"To create that immersive world, Niantic made unauthorized use of Plaintiff's and other Class members' property by placing Pokéstops and Pokémon gyms thereupon or nearby," said Jennifer Pafiti in the lawsuit. "In so doing, Niantic has encouraged Pokémon Go's millions of players to make unwanted incursions onto the properties of plaintiff, and other members of the class, a clear and ongoing invasion of their use and enjoyment of their land from which defendants have profited and continue to profit."

Due to the randomized placement of the Pokémon, Pokéstops and Pokémon Gyms, they have turned up in some unwanted locations such as in houses, cemeteries and museums. According to Jeffrey Marder, a man living in New Jersey, he received at least five unwelcome visitors that wanted access to his backyard to catch Pokémon within the first week of the game's launch.

"Plaintiff and other Class members have all suffered and will continue to suffer harm and damages as a result of Defendants' unlawful and wrongful conduct. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy," said Pafiti.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Capt. Obvious on Wednesday August 03 2016, @08:14PM

    by Capt. Obvious (6089) on Wednesday August 03 2016, @08:14PM (#383743)

    ? It's not reasonable to expect Niantic to be able to personally vet every single inch of the planet for whether they should be able to spawn Pokemon or whatever there

    Why isn't it reasonable to expect a company that wants to be worldwide to put up worldwide resources? I mean, yeah it would suck if it was a staged rollout for the people who had to wait, but Niantic is making more money because of the global reach of their data. Expecting that global data to be verified seems like the least you can expect.

    Now, in this particular case, you can claim that spawning Pokemon that then migrate around, even on private property, ought be okay. And we can have a fun discussion about that. But I'm just puzzled why this "I cannot grow in scale without adding more data checks" is a legitimate argument.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2