Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday August 03 2016, @11:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the burning-bridges dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

Black Lives Matter has taken offense at police saying “Blue Lives Matter” and others who say “All Lives Matter,” but now a Wisconsin school is risking ire by branding a class on environmentalism “Green Lives Matter.”

The course at University of Wisconsin at Green Bay will encourage students to support the “environmental justice movement” by “the merging of civil rights and environmental concerns.” But even Scott Furlong, the dean of social sciences at the school, acknowledged that the class name plays on what has become a loaded term.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/01/green-lives-matter-college-course-title-has-some-critics-seeing-red.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 04 2016, @04:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 04 2016, @04:43AM (#383933)

    ...as long as you treat people fairly.

    You don't really even need to treat people fairly, not on a personal level, but the law and company policies and stuff absolutely must treat everyone equally. That there is the real problem, that even decades after the end of segregation and Jim Crow laws, white supremacy is still policy and law in so many places and nearly half the country wants even stronger white supremacy laws and policies. The government is not your personal tool for oppression, its supposed to work for the benefit of all people, not just people who look and think the same way you do. Being human does not require one to have a specific amount of melanin, a specific gender, sexual orientation or identity, or a specific set of beliefs, and the law is the law because everyone is equal before it; a selectively applied law is no law at all (particularly if the selectivity is based on one's inherited or inborn traits) but merely oppression and abuse of power and authority.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 04 2016, @11:30AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 04 2016, @11:30AM (#384017)

    even decades after the end of segregation and Jim Crow laws, white supremacy is still policy and law in so many places

    Examples?

    • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Thursday August 04 2016, @11:01PM

      by t-3 (4907) on Thursday August 04 2016, @11:01PM (#384297)

      I think a better way of making that point would be to say: The (white) power structure that was in place during Jim Crow/segregation era is still largely intact, still largely/disproportionately filled with white people, and that there has been no attempt to rectify the mistakes of the past or to address the situation as it currently stands because the people who happen to be in power like the situation as it is.