Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday August 05 2016, @06:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the revenge-is-sweet dept.

Imagine you are responsible for providing legal representation for indigent people in your state (the public defender's office). Seven years ago, a request for additional funding to meet increased case load was vetoed. Your budget was cut in 2015 and now the governor's office is recommending further cuts. Making things worse is the fact that the number of cases has increased 12%. What would you do?

The Director of the Missouri Public Defender System came up with a novel approach to help meet the increased caseload burden and sent a letter to the Governor (PDF) compelling him to work cases.

Additional reporting here, here, and here.


Original Submission   Alternate Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 05 2016, @11:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 05 2016, @11:12AM (#384446)

    I'd guess the cases can't simply be dismissed, because the defendants *do* have a lawyer. It's just that each of those lawyers is also working for 100+ other people at the same time. And since the state government refused to set a cap, each of those lawyers can always be made to take on another client.

    So long as the public defender's office has lawyers on staff, this will continue. A strike or mass resignation is the only way this will come to a head any time soon.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1