Imagine you are responsible for providing legal representation for indigent people in your state (the public defender's office). Seven years ago, a request for additional funding to meet increased case load was vetoed. Your budget was cut in 2015 and now the governor's office is recommending further cuts. Making things worse is the fact that the number of cases has increased 12%. What would you do?
The Director of the Missouri Public Defender System came up with a novel approach to help meet the increased caseload burden and sent a letter to the Governor (PDF) compelling him to work cases.
Additional reporting here, here, and here.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by NCommander on Friday August 05 2016, @11:24AM
Quality in and of itself is not basis for an appeal. One can argue that having a substandard lawyer runs around Miranda rights, but that's going to be an uphill battle to fight, and if you can't get a good lawyer to defend you at trial, getting a good lawyer to lodge and win the appeal is likely impossible. As long as a lawyer doesn't make an actual error of law, there isn't grounds to appeal a case. There's nothing illegal about having a defense lawyer who doesn't once object.
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Friday August 05 2016, @02:39PM
To be a pedant, the right to an attorney would rightfully be called your Gideon rights not your Miranda rights.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 05 2016, @04:23PM
You have the right to be pedantic ...
(Score: 2) by linuxrocks123 on Friday August 05 2016, @09:04PM
Incompetent representation is grounds for mistrial: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ineffective_assistance_of_counsel [wikipedia.org]