Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday August 05 2016, @06:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the revenge-is-sweet dept.

Imagine you are responsible for providing legal representation for indigent people in your state (the public defender's office). Seven years ago, a request for additional funding to meet increased case load was vetoed. Your budget was cut in 2015 and now the governor's office is recommending further cuts. Making things worse is the fact that the number of cases has increased 12%. What would you do?

The Director of the Missouri Public Defender System came up with a novel approach to help meet the increased caseload burden and sent a letter to the Governor (PDF) compelling him to work cases.

Additional reporting here, here, and here.


Original Submission   Alternate Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by NCommander on Friday August 05 2016, @11:24AM

    by NCommander (2) Subscriber Badge <michael@casadevall.pro> on Friday August 05 2016, @11:24AM (#384450) Homepage Journal

    Quality in and of itself is not basis for an appeal. One can argue that having a substandard lawyer runs around Miranda rights, but that's going to be an uphill battle to fight, and if you can't get a good lawyer to defend you at trial, getting a good lawyer to lodge and win the appeal is likely impossible. As long as a lawyer doesn't make an actual error of law, there isn't grounds to appeal a case. There's nothing illegal about having a defense lawyer who doesn't once object.

    --
    Still always moving
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Friday August 05 2016, @02:39PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 05 2016, @02:39PM (#384489) Journal

    To be a pedant, the right to an attorney would rightfully be called your Gideon rights not your Miranda rights.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 05 2016, @04:23PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 05 2016, @04:23PM (#384520)

      You have the right to be pedantic ...

  • (Score: 2) by linuxrocks123 on Friday August 05 2016, @09:04PM

    by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Friday August 05 2016, @09:04PM (#384623) Journal

    Incompetent representation is grounds for mistrial: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ineffective_assistance_of_counsel [wikipedia.org]