Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Facebook to Make Ads Harder to Block

posted by n1 on Wednesday August 10 2016, @01:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the selling-everything dept.

DiarrhoeaChaChaCha writes:

Facebook is going to start forcing ads to appear for all users of its desktop website, even if they use ad-blocking software. The social network said on Tuesday that it will change the way advertising is loaded into its desktop website to make its ad units considerably more difficult for ad blockers to detect. “Facebook is ad-supported. Ads are a part of the Facebook experience; they’re not a tack on,” said Andrew “Boz” Bosworth, vice president of Facebook’s ads and business platform.

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Facebook to Make Ads Harder to Block | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 71 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Fnord666 on Wednesday August 10 2016, @08:21AM

    by Fnord666 (652) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @08:21AM (#386175) Homepage

    the computing and network power gets high enough and the prices for it low enough, somebody writes a platform in which "social media" nodes can be created ad-hoc so easily that any kid can install and manage it. No incentive for kids to join a centralized site

    (now, that's an idea)

    You mean like this one [diasporafoundation.org] was supposed to be?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   5  

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday August 10 2016, @09:47AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 10 2016, @09:47AM (#386195) Journal

    And a bit further, yes.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by TheRaven on Wednesday August 10 2016, @10:02AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @10:02AM (#386198) Journal
    No. Disapora failed to realise that the most important things for any kind of open system like this are a well-defined protocol and a permissively licensed reference implementation (ideally in library form, useable from multiple languages). They instead created a poorly specified ad-hoc protocol and an AGPL reference implementation (a license that basically precludes anyone from looking at the code if they might ever want to implement the protocol).
    --
    sudo mod me up

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by tangomargarine on Wednesday August 10 2016, @03:06PM

      by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @03:06PM (#386279)

      and an AGPL reference implementation (a license that basically precludes anyone from looking at the code if they might ever want to implement the protocol).

      It's basically the GPL with "no seriously, make sure the source is available" tacked on. Why is that so toxic?

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"

    • (Score: 2) by Fnord666 on Wednesday August 10 2016, @10:44PM

      by Fnord666 (652) on Wednesday August 10 2016, @10:44PM (#386417) Homepage
      To be fair I didn't say it was a successful attempt. :-) OTOH you can learn just as much if not more from a failure than a success.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @07:59PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 10 2016, @07:59PM (#386362)

    back in my day, we just set up a BBS