Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the it-was-some-puerto-rican-guy dept.

WikiLeaks has announced a $20,000 bounty for information leading to a conviction in the case of a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer:

The speculation started within days of Seth Rich being gunned down in what D.C. police believe was an attempted robbery near his townhouse in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Northwest Washington.

Some on the Internet wondered if Rich was killed because of his work as a staffer with the Democratic National Committee, even suggesting he had handed WikiLeaks the 20,000 emails that embarrassed the DNC and forced the ouster of its chairwoman. Others suggested he was helping the FBI expose wrongdoing in the presidential election, and that made him a target.

On Tuesday, WikiLeaks shoved those conspiracy theories into the mainstream when it announced on Twitter a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction in Rich's killing on July 10 in the 2100 block of Flagler Place NW. It adds to a $25,000 reward offered by D.C. police, customary in all District homicides.

Julian Assange maintains that the organization does not reveal its sources, even after their deaths:

Speaking to Dutch television program Nieuswsuur Tuesday after earlier announcing a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Seth Rich's killer, Assange said the July 10 murder of Rich in Northwest Washington was an example of the risk leakers undertake. "Whistle-blowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks," Assange said. "As a 27-year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington."

When the interviewer interjected that the murder may have been a robbery, Assange pushed back. "No," he said. "There's no finding. So... I'm suggesting that our sources take risks." When pressed as to whether Rich was, in fact, the leaker, Assange stated that the organization does not reveal its sources.

Also at Slate and WAMU.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:45AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:45AM (#386522)

    Internet Hillary Defense Force thanks you for your ongoing effort, royal employee. An appropriate amount of compensation has been deposited into your account.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Flamebait=2, Insightful=1, Funny=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:51AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:51AM (#386523)

    Get over yourself. As if this podunk little site is worth spending a dime on psy-ops.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @09:50AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @09:50AM (#386555)

      So, this is part of your manditory unpaid overtime, then?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @09:53AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @09:53AM (#386556)

      That's what makes it great.

    • (Score: 2) by opinionated_science on Thursday August 11 2016, @12:13PM

      by opinionated_science (4031) on Thursday August 11 2016, @12:13PM (#386567)

      and yet, we have your presence to shine a light on our little piece of discussion...

      Did you get lost on the way back from your political toadying?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @12:31PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @12:31PM (#386568)

        Toady?
        Don't you mean sheeple!?!!

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Thursday August 11 2016, @12:55PM

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday August 11 2016, @12:55PM (#386574) Journal

        That AC has a legitimate opinion. Maybe instead of accusing anons of XYZ, you could explain why you think killing this staffer would be a well-calculated move on the part of the Clintons/DNC?

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:52PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:52PM (#386681) Journal

    So, you have no rebuttal, then?