SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
WikiLeaks has announced a $20,000 bounty for information leading to a conviction in the case of a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer:
The speculation started within days of Seth Rich being gunned down in what D.C. police believe was an attempted robbery near his townhouse in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Northwest Washington.
Some on the Internet wondered if Rich was killed because of his work as a staffer with the Democratic National Committee, even suggesting he had handed WikiLeaks the 20,000 emails that embarrassed the DNC and forced the ouster of its chairwoman. Others suggested he was helping the FBI expose wrongdoing in the presidential election, and that made him a target.
On Tuesday, WikiLeaks shoved those conspiracy theories into the mainstream when it announced on Twitter a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction in Rich's killing on July 10 in the 2100 block of Flagler Place NW. It adds to a $25,000 reward offered by D.C. police, customary in all District homicides.
Julian Assange maintains that the organization does not reveal its sources, even after their deaths:
Speaking to Dutch television program Nieuswsuur Tuesday after earlier announcing a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Seth Rich's killer, Assange said the July 10 murder of Rich in Northwest Washington was an example of the risk leakers undertake. "Whistle-blowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks," Assange said. "As a 27-year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington."
When the interviewer interjected that the murder may have been a robbery, Assange pushed back. "No," he said. "There's no finding. So... I'm suggesting that our sources take risks." When pressed as to whether Rich was, in fact, the leaker, Assange stated that the organization does not reveal its sources.
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:56PM
Against the Obama Administration [wikipedia.org] or its former Secretary of State [theintercept.com].
I mean he is most certainly not so afraid of those folks that he's been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London for four years or anything like that. [wikipedia.org]
As such, he has absolutely no reason to inject himself into the US election cycle other than to present the Truth™ for the sake of helping his fellow man.
In fact, I understand that he had been in a romantic relationship with Chelsea Manning and is now Chelsea Clinton's back door man [urbandictionary.com].
As such, if he has any agenda, it's fucking as many girls named "Chelsea" as possible.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @07:08PM
Assangel is a self aggrandizing douche nozzle who needs to feel important. He doesn't need an axe to grind - all he needs is attention. In this instance (and probably others) he's just the conduit by which documents were routed into the public realm to fulfill the desire of others.
(Score: 2) by Zz9zZ on Thursday August 11 2016, @07:18PM
Sure he has some motive, but I think you're violating both aspects of your sig :P
~Tilting at windmills~
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @08:48PM
Logic and politics are not the same thing. Politics is the largest appeal to emotion and self referencing points of contention to make yourself believe you are in the right.