Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the it-was-some-puerto-rican-guy dept.

WikiLeaks has announced a $20,000 bounty for information leading to a conviction in the case of a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer:

The speculation started within days of Seth Rich being gunned down in what D.C. police believe was an attempted robbery near his townhouse in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Northwest Washington.

Some on the Internet wondered if Rich was killed because of his work as a staffer with the Democratic National Committee, even suggesting he had handed WikiLeaks the 20,000 emails that embarrassed the DNC and forced the ouster of its chairwoman. Others suggested he was helping the FBI expose wrongdoing in the presidential election, and that made him a target.

On Tuesday, WikiLeaks shoved those conspiracy theories into the mainstream when it announced on Twitter a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction in Rich's killing on July 10 in the 2100 block of Flagler Place NW. It adds to a $25,000 reward offered by D.C. police, customary in all District homicides.

Julian Assange maintains that the organization does not reveal its sources, even after their deaths:

Speaking to Dutch television program Nieuswsuur Tuesday after earlier announcing a $20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Seth Rich's killer, Assange said the July 10 murder of Rich in Northwest Washington was an example of the risk leakers undertake. "Whistle-blowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks," Assange said. "As a 27-year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington."

When the interviewer interjected that the murder may have been a robbery, Assange pushed back. "No," he said. "There's no finding. So... I'm suggesting that our sources take risks." When pressed as to whether Rich was, in fact, the leaker, Assange stated that the organization does not reveal its sources.

Also at Slate and WAMU.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Thursday August 11 2016, @07:39PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday August 11 2016, @07:39PM (#386762) Journal

    By "wildly insecure" you mean the only Democratic server that hasn't been provably hacked?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @08:01PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @08:01PM (#386774)

    Are you trying to pick at nits, suggesting that China, Russia, et al can't intercept plaintext SMTP sent through the internet at large - let alone break into a single internet-facing server - as a means to distract from the fact that Hillary Rodham Clinton can and should be charged for breaking federal laws governing the handling of and reporting requirements for classified information [soylentnews.org]?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 12 2016, @02:09PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 12 2016, @02:09PM (#387020)

      internet facing windows "server", that is.