Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 11 2016, @11:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the TLA++ dept.

Forget the 60 TB SSD. Toshiba is teasing a possible 100 TB SSD:

The Flash Memory Summit saw Toshiba deliver a presentation about quad level cell (QLC) technology – adding substantially to the prospect of a product being delivered in the "near future". We have heard about this QLC (4bits/cell NAND technology) quite recently.

After Seagate tantalised us with a 60TB SSD, along comes Toshiba with a 100TB QLC SSD concept.

Flash Memory Summit attendees saw Toshiba presenters put flesh on the bones and envisage a QLC 3D SSD with a PCIe gen 3 interface and more than 100TB of capacity. It would have 3GB/sec sequential read bandwidth and 1GB/sec sequential write bandwidth. It would do random reading and writing at 50,000 and 14,000 IOPS respectively. The active state power consumption would be 9 watts, the same as a 3.5-inch, 8TB SATA 6Gbit/s disk drive, while the idle power consumption be less than 100 mWatts, compared to the disk drive's 8 watts.

Even if the "near future" isn't so near, or the final capacity does not end up at around 100 TB, it is still interesting to see 3D NAND technology enabling a serious push for 4-bits-per-cell NAND, which would normally face endurance issues.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Fishscene on Thursday August 11 2016, @01:33PM

    by Fishscene (4361) on Thursday August 11 2016, @01:33PM (#386583)

    These super-high capacity drives are only going to drive down the cost of drives across the board. It might take a bit, but I for one look forward to high capacity and lower prices.
    :D

    --
    I know I am not God, because every time I pray to Him, it's because I'm not perfect and thankful for what He's done.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday August 11 2016, @01:46PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday August 11 2016, @01:46PM (#386587) Journal

    Putting out higher capacities with newer and denser varieties of vertical NAND is definitely how SSD prices will be driven down.

    Slickdeals is down so I can't get the "good" prices, but a quick search finds that 1 TB SSDs are just under $300 (I would guess you could find it as low as $220 on sale), and 2 TB SSDs are slightly above $600. 4 TB SSD prices are still in la-la-land for now.

    New generations of 3D NAND may lower $/GB as much as 30%. We can also see a clear path for 3D NAND density to double a few times (that includes an increase in layers to ~96-128, and string stacking [theregister.co.uk] to stack 2-3 dies), whereas pre-3D NAND was facing insurmountable endurance issues.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2) by Yog-Yogguth on Thursday August 11 2016, @03:35PM

    by Yog-Yogguth (1862) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 11 2016, @03:35PM (#386618) Journal

    I suspect the Toshiba announcements are 10% vaporware and 90% fraudware to pay old penalty fines and stay afloat.

    --
    Bite harder Ouroboros, bite! tails.boum.org/ linux USB CD secure desktop IRC *crypt tor (not endorsements (XKeyScore))
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday August 11 2016, @04:41PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday August 11 2016, @04:41PM (#386638)

    I'm gonna need to call my ISP ... Don't have enough bandwidth yet to download that much porn.
    PSA: Call your doctor is your erection lasts longer than 4GB.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 11 2016, @05:21PM (#386661)

    It might take a bit

    Or, in this case, 60~100 TB!

    :)