Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday August 11 2016, @10:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the addiction-of-their-own dept.

USA Today reports that Drug Enforcement Administration agents regularly mine Americans' travel information in order to seize hundreds of millions of dollars of cash:

Federal drug agents regularly mine Americans' travel information to profile people who might be ferrying money for narcotics traffickers — though they almost never use what they learn to make arrests or build criminal cases.

[...] It is a lucrative endeavor, and one that remains largely unknown outside the drug agency. DEA units assigned to patrol 15 of the nation's busiest airports seized more than $209 million in cash from at least 5,200 people over the past decade after concluding the money was linked to drug trafficking, according to Justice Department records. Most of the money was passed on to local police departments that lend officers to assist the drug agency.

"They count on this as part of the budget," said Louis Weiss, a former supervisor of the DEA group assigned to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. "Basically, you've got to feed the monster." In most cases, records show the agents gave the suspected couriers a receipt for the cash — sometimes totaling $50,000 or more, stuffed into suitcases or socks — and sent them on their way without ever charging them with a crime.

[...] USA Today identified 87 cases in recent years in which the Justice Department went to federal court to seize cash from travelers after agents said they had been tipped off to a suspicious itinerary. Those cases likely represent only a small fraction of the instances in which agents have stopped travelers or seized cash based on their travel patterns, because few such encounters ever make it to court. Those cases nonetheless offer evidence of the program's sweep. Filings show agents were able to profile passengers on Amtrak and nearly every major U.S. airline, often without the companies' consent. "We won't release that information without a subpoena," American Airlines spokesman Ross Feinstein said.

[...] Agents seized $25,000 from Christelle Tillerson's suitcase in 2014 as she was waiting to board a flight from Detroit to Chicago. [...] Tillerson told the agents that her boyfriend had withdrawn the money from his U.S. Postal Service retirement account so that she could buy a truck, according to court records. Agents were suspicious; Tillerson was an ex-convict, who had spent time in prison for driving a load of marijuana into the United States from Mexico. She seemed to have little money of her own. And a police dog smelled drugs on the cash.

Agents seized the money, and let Tillerson go. Her lawyer, Cyril Hall, said she was never arrested, or even questioned about whether she could give agents information about traffickers. A year and a half later — after she produced paperwork showing that much of the money had indeed come from her boyfriend's retirement fund — the Justice Department agreed to return the money, minus $4,000. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Detroit, Gina Balaya, said prosecutors concluded that "a small percentage of the funds should be forfeited."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by edIII on Friday August 12 2016, @12:32AM

    by edIII (791) on Friday August 12 2016, @12:32AM (#386843)

    Absolutely not

    They count on this as part of the budget," said Louis Weiss, a former supervisor of the DEA group assigned to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. "Basically, you've got to feed the monster." In most cases, records show the agents gave the suspected couriers a receipt for the cash — sometimes totaling $50,000 or more, stuffed into suitcases or socks — and sent them on their way without ever charging them with a crime.

    Justice isn't even involved at all.

    The courier failing to bring the $50,000 would have his knees broken, throat slit, and/or family killed. A receipt showing the feds busted his ass, may actually mitigate that. Corrupt LEOs have a better chance at catching a courier they already know if they let him get away. They can justify it whatever way they want, such as sparing the court system resources on small time offenders, or reeling in bigger fish. That's still bullshit, and we're letting people get away with a crime.

    The entire reason why is that the cartels are simply willing to allow a percentage of money to be seized as a cost of doing business, and the government via its agents, are all to happy to cooperate in the great cycle of budget replenishment and filling up slush funds.

    It's a win-win-win for the couriers, cartels, and DEA agents.

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 12 2016, @04:16AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 12 2016, @04:16AM (#386894)

    It's a win-win-win for the couriers, cartels, and DEA agents.

    And its a giant loss for we the people because of its blatant unconstitutionality, violating the 1st*, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th**, and 14th amendments.

    * "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" - Tillerson, mentioned in the summary, is the only person I've ever heard to get anything back after being robbed by police
    ** "nor excessive fines imposed" - the government stealing anything, even a single cent, from citizens like this is an excessive fine