Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Saturday August 13 2016, @08:19AM   Printer-friendly
from the she-said-he-said-he-didn't-(he-did) dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

Television news has long used graphics at the bottom of their screens to identify the people and places in their stories – but with the 2016 presidential race, two networks lately have been injecting analysis into them during their news reporting.

It started in June when Donald Trump denied having said Japan should have nuclear weapons. CNN inserted this snarky line in their chyron:

TRUMP: I NEVER SAID JAPAN SHOULD HAVE NUKES (HE DID)

[...] While fact-checking may or may not be a legitimate new use of the chyron, what is noticeable is a distinct absence of chyron fact-checking for various claims made by Clinton.

For instance, Clinton recently told Fox News' Chris Wallace that FBI Director James Comey had called her answers about her private email use as secretary of state "truthful" – he did not make such a sweeping statement.

Source: FoxNews


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 13 2016, @02:25PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 13 2016, @02:25PM (#387488)

    > It really raises the issue of whether she is mentally competent.

    Her problem is that complicated answers are not easily communicated in two or three sentences. Instead of just taking the simple road and saying "mea culpa" she tries to shoehorn a complex defense into a simplistic response. When 99.9% of the audience has no knowledge of the details beyond sound bites that ends up failing on all counts. However, her experience, with the dozens of fake scandals like whitewater, benghazi, travelgate, etc is that taking the simple "mea culpa" route doesn't work either -- it just gets exaggerated into yet more ammo to go after her. Knowing your posting history your immediate response will be "of course that's what happens, she deserves it!" which is exactly the point.

    When she actually gets a chance to speak at length about a "scandal" she comes across as ultra competent. For example, when she testified for ~10 hours in front of congress in the last of the 8 (9?) benghazi investigations and totally wiped the floor with her interrogators.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +5  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=3, Total=5
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5