SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Some may have heard of scambaiting spammers to waste their time and resources. There are many sites like 419eater which concentrate on it. However, Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story which takes things a step further. A French security researcher says he managed to turn the tables on a cyber-scammer by sending him malware. Whether or not that is ethical is left as an exercise for the readership.
But Ivan Kwiatkowski played along with the scheme until he was asked to send credit card details. He instead sent an attachment containing ransomware.
[...] When Mr Kwiatkowski's parents stumbled across one such website, he decided to telephone the company and pretend he had been fooled.
The "assistant" on the telephone tried to bamboozle him with technical jargon and encouraged him to buy a "tech protection subscription" costing 300 euros (£260).
Mr Kwiatkowski told the assistant that he could not see his credit card details clearly and offered to send a photograph of the information.
But he instead sent a copy of Locky ransomware disguised as a compressed photograph, which the assistant said he had opened.
"He says nothing for a short while, and then... 'I tried opening your photo, nothing happens.' I do my best not to burst out laughing," Mr Kwiatkowski wrote in his blog.
[...] Mr Kwiatkowski said he could not be absolutely certain whether the ransomware had infected the scammer's computer, but there was a fair chance it had.
"He did not let on that something had happened to his computer, so my attempt is best represented as an unconfirmed kill," said Mr Kwiatkowski.
"But encrypting a whole file system does take some time."
He acknowledged that some people may have found his retaliation unethical, but said responses had been "mostly positive".
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday August 17 2016, @01:11AM
Blame? God, I have plenty of blame to pass around. Microsoft is so very obvious. The education system is to blame, for not teaching people. People are to blame for being lazy.
Recently, the wife was having problems. I tried to help. She begins by explaining that "This is a VLC file" and have to interrupt, "No, that's not a VLC file, it is an Matroska file, which you have told Windows to associate with VLC." She says, no, she's never told Windows to associate files with VLC" and I have to explain that she has, in fact, told, or at least permitted Windows to associate Matroska files with VLC.
In this case, I succeeded only in making her aware that there are many different kinds of media files, and that VLC may or may not be "the best" program to use with that file. But, her end goal, of burning the file to a DVD was further stymied by her choice of media burning software. It was necessary to find a program which would convert her Matroska file into an avi file, then burn the file to disk.
File systems and operating systems that DO NOT hide extensions are ultimately "easier" to use, IMHO, because real education and understanding of what you are doing is eventually absorbed by the user.
Fact is, I'm rather slow to learn new computer skills. But, if I were limited to dumbed down Windows systems that hid the file extensions from me, I would be much slower.
And, that is where Average Joe is - he can't learn because he can't invest the time to learn, and Windows hides important information from him anyway.