Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday August 16 2016, @04:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the vigilante dept.

Some may have heard of scambaiting spammers to waste their time and resources. There are many sites like 419eater which concentrate on it. However, Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story which takes things a step further. A French security researcher says he managed to turn the tables on a cyber-scammer by sending him malware. Whether or not that is ethical is left as an exercise for the readership.

But Ivan Kwiatkowski played along with the scheme until he was asked to send credit card details. He instead sent an attachment containing ransomware.

[...] When Mr Kwiatkowski's parents stumbled across one such website, he decided to telephone the company and pretend he had been fooled.

The "assistant" on the telephone tried to bamboozle him with technical jargon and encouraged him to buy a "tech protection subscription" costing 300 euros (£260).

Mr Kwiatkowski told the assistant that he could not see his credit card details clearly and offered to send a photograph of the information.

But he instead sent a copy of Locky ransomware disguised as a compressed photograph, which the assistant said he had opened.

"He says nothing for a short while, and then... 'I tried opening your photo, nothing happens.' I do my best not to burst out laughing," Mr Kwiatkowski wrote in his blog.

[...] Mr Kwiatkowski said he could not be absolutely certain whether the ransomware had infected the scammer's computer, but there was a fair chance it had.

"He did not let on that something had happened to his computer, so my attempt is best represented as an unconfirmed kill," said Mr Kwiatkowski.

"But encrypting a whole file system does take some time."

He acknowledged that some people may have found his retaliation unethical, but said responses had been "mostly positive".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by AudioGuy on Wednesday August 17 2016, @11:03PM

    by AudioGuy (24) on Wednesday August 17 2016, @11:03PM (#389358) Journal

    I think this is an issue with TWO ethical components.

    The first is the obvious one being discussed: Is it ok the break the law to stop a lawbreaker?

    This seems like a slippery slope to me. We have now law enforcement agencies doing things like selling drugs to set up drug dealers, setting people up with terrorist plots so they can arrest them, selling arms to drug cartels, engaging in serious violations of privacy, etc.

    I happen to think most of that is ethically wrong.

    But there is a second component: What can you do when the crime is being perpetrated directly upon YOU. Is it ok for an individual to respond in kind to a direct threat?

    Murder is a crime. But killing someone who is trying to kill you - not so much.

    I believe the distinction is very important.

    So in this case I would say, probably ok.

    But if someone (other than law enforcement, within legal limits) decided to purposely SEEK this, with the primary purpose of setting up the people running this scam - probably wrong.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2