Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday August 17 2016, @08:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the study-with-suds dept.

Whirlpool (the appliance manufacturer) donated washers and driers to schools and increased attendance.

According to Whirlpool's research, one in five school children report difficulty finding clean clothes to wear to school. It turns out that offering free in-school laundry services to kids with attendance problems increases their attendance.

When compared to factors like economic opportunity, unemployment, and institutional racism, laundry seems pretty inconsequential in the fight to keep kids in school. But while that might be the case for their parents, for a ten-year-old who already has the odds stacked against them, having nothing clean to wear to school could be the deciding factor in whether or not they want to face their classmates that day.

I can remember my grandmother telling me that she thought lunches in schools were a wonderful innovation, because they didn't have anything like that when she was a girl, and many children couldn't come because they wouldn't have lunch. I'm sure back then nobody thought of lunch as something school should provide. Now apparently laundry is the next big innovation.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by dry on Thursday August 18 2016, @03:12AM

    by dry (223) on Thursday August 18 2016, @03:12AM (#389464) Journal

    There is also the meta problem that no one is mentioning that we have more people than we have jobs, more grads than we have jobs, more qualified people than we have jobs, the only effect of washing schoolkids clothes is going to be having slightly less stinky teens. Its not like clean kids magically create jobs, or handing out diplomas magically creates jobs. So improving graduation rates isn't going to do anything, really.

    It keeps the off the streets and if they graduate, they can be talked into going into higher education, which will keep them off the street for that much longer. Bonus for the elite, they can also be talked into going into debt for life.
    This was the primary reason for universal education. Once automation reduced the labour market enough that the elite allowed child labour laws to be passed, there were all these unemployed youngsters standing around on street corners getting into trouble, so they were put into school. As the labour market shrinks, they're kept in school longer. Eventually they'll be in school till 40+ yrs old, be in debt labour until they're too sick to work, and then be allowed (or encouraged) to die.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2