Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday August 17 2016, @10:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the up-in-smoke dept.

Courthouse News Service reports:

The Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday that the Justice Department is barred from using federal funds to prosecute individuals in states where medical marijuana is legal and the individuals are in compliance with state law.

Federal prosecutors in California and Washington state indicted a number of individuals under the Controlled Substances Act on a range of offenses related to the growing and distribution of marijuana plants.

The defendants moved to dismiss the indictments, arguing that an appropriations bill passed by Congress in 2014 and renewed in 2015 and 2016 explicitly bars the Justice Department from using federal funds to interfere with states that have legalized medical marijuana.

The story goes on to characterize the legal battle and the reasoning behind the ruling. Basically that ruling boils down to the fact that the state laws apply in this case, and the funding laws passed by congress seem to be only a bit player in this ruling.

Writing for the three-judge panel, O'Scannlain said that Congress' appropriations bill expressly prohibits the Justice Department from spending money to keep 40 states — including California and Washington — the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico from implementing their own medical marijuana laws. And federal criminal defendants may fight the use of those funds, he said.

The panel appeared to go further than just enforcing the "No Federal Funds" use by stating:

"By officially permitting certain conduct, state law provides for non-prosecution of individuals who engage in such conduct. If the federal government prosecutes such individuals, it has prevented the state from giving practical effect to its law providing for non-prosecution of individuals who engage in the permitted conduct."

That seems as close as you can come to a "States Rights" line of reasoning and still be welcome in liberal circles. The decision is reportedly being carefully scrutinized in the other circuit, and I would expect to see the government seek another venue.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Thursday August 18 2016, @07:17PM

    by JNCF (4317) on Thursday August 18 2016, @07:17PM (#389685) Journal

    This, completely. I have met cops who were totally fine in my experience of interacting with them, but I have always understood that they protect the bad cops. I could see the potential for some very small police departments to not have a culture of corruption, but in any reasonably sized city you have to expect that every cop has seen another cop break the law and done nothing about it. This is inexcusable. The barrel is rotten.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2