Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 19 2016, @01:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the !progressive dept.

Democracy Now! reports via AlterNet

Ken Salazar is a former U.S. Senator from Colorado who now works at WilmerHale, one of the most influential lobbying firms in Washington. Some groups have criticized Salazar's selection due to his vocal support of fracking, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the Keystone XL pipeline.

In addition to Ken Salazar, other leaders of the transition team include former Obama National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, Center for American Progress head Neera Tanden, former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, and Maggie Williams, the director of Harvard's Institute of Politics.

[...] WilmerHale [represents] corporate clients across the board--Cigna, for instance. Cigna is a healthcare giant that is fighting for a merger with Anthem. WilmerHale represents them, Delta Airlines, Verizon, investment firms, a mining company. So, WilmerHale is a major law and lobbying firm.

Ken Salazar is not a registered lobbyist at WilmerHale; he is a partner there. Interestingly enough, Hillary Clinton had published a year ago an op-ed deriding the revolving door where lawmakers leave office and become lobbyists or help special interests. And she had specifically said that she was concerned about lawmakers who go into that line of work, public policy work, for corporate clients, but do not register as a lobbyist, which seems to fit the description of Ken Salazar.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Friday August 19 2016, @07:14AM

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Friday August 19 2016, @07:14AM (#389967) Homepage Journal

    You are lucky that curroption was formalized. You haven't lived in countries where corruption happens behind the scenes and pointing it out can get you arrested.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Francis on Friday August 19 2016, @02:14PM

    by Francis (5544) on Friday August 19 2016, @02:14PM (#390074)

    I disagree, a corrupt system like that is one that will eventually change. At some point people will get fed up with it and have enough civil disobedience that it changes. Or the system just fails under its own weight.

    A system with formalized corruption can generally go on like that indefinitely as there's going to be people that don't see it and it's generally more stable so the civil unrest is somewhat less likely.

    • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Friday August 19 2016, @05:17PM

      by cubancigar11 (330) on Friday August 19 2016, @05:17PM (#390162) Homepage Journal

      That is just wishful thinking in a globalized world. Let us change our understanding of the system first by acknowledging that:
      1) There are no land masses left to discover.
      2) There are no land masses where you can declare yourself a winner, do whatever-the-hell you want to, and basically become the system.
      3) That revolutions are going to happen.

      Look at the the latest history - look in middle east which was apparently going through some sort of "spring". Just see what is happening there. Which country is funding which authoritarian regime. What is happening to the mastermind of this butcher (HINT: she is about to become the most power woman in the world). Let us just accept the fact that your situation under a system that accepts and formalizes corruption is way way waaaaaaay better than people participating in a revolution against a corrupt system that is several continents away from your country. This is a globalized world and time has come for us to modify our behavior accordingly. Tough for you, but I don't think you are billionaire.

      When the so called world-wars were happening, only a handful of countries were fighting each other albeit all over the world. The failure of system you are hoping for, this time, will be true world war where all the countries will be fighting with each other and all the governments will have nuclear weapon. There is no shorter way.

      • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Friday August 19 2016, @05:20PM

        by cubancigar11 (330) on Friday August 19 2016, @05:20PM (#390169) Homepage Journal

        *****

        3) That revolutions NOT are going to happen.

        Filler for our mighty STUPID filter. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.