Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 19 2016, @01:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the !progressive dept.

Democracy Now! reports via AlterNet

Ken Salazar is a former U.S. Senator from Colorado who now works at WilmerHale, one of the most influential lobbying firms in Washington. Some groups have criticized Salazar's selection due to his vocal support of fracking, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the Keystone XL pipeline.

In addition to Ken Salazar, other leaders of the transition team include former Obama National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, Center for American Progress head Neera Tanden, former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, and Maggie Williams, the director of Harvard's Institute of Politics.

[...] WilmerHale [represents] corporate clients across the board--Cigna, for instance. Cigna is a healthcare giant that is fighting for a merger with Anthem. WilmerHale represents them, Delta Airlines, Verizon, investment firms, a mining company. So, WilmerHale is a major law and lobbying firm.

Ken Salazar is not a registered lobbyist at WilmerHale; he is a partner there. Interestingly enough, Hillary Clinton had published a year ago an op-ed deriding the revolving door where lawmakers leave office and become lobbyists or help special interests. And she had specifically said that she was concerned about lawmakers who go into that line of work, public policy work, for corporate clients, but do not register as a lobbyist, which seems to fit the description of Ken Salazar.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 19 2016, @07:00PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 19 2016, @07:00PM (#390216)

    Lies are not all the same. Mistakes are not all the same. Let's use the term "falsehood" to include both.

    If you count falsehoods per hour, obviously Trump is spewing at the higher rate. He's a bullshitter who won't back down.

    Hillary is more calculating. Her falsehoods are less frequent and much less random. She very deliberately tells us things to cover up her crimes.

    It's not all the same. Simple counting is not correct. It's like person X has 4 paper cuts, person Y has 3 bullet holes, and you determine that person X is thus more injured because 4 is greater than 3. No, it doesn't work that way.