Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 19 2016, @04:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the 'cell'ing-out dept.

Two Soylentils wrote in to tell us of news from the US Justice Department's plans to stop using private prisons.

Justice Department Says it will End use of Private Prisons

The Justice Department plans to end its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates announced the decision on Thursday in a memo that instructs officials to either decline to renew the contracts for private prison operators when they expire or "substantially reduce" the contracts' scope. The goal, Yates wrote, is "reducing — and ultimately ending — our use of privately operated prisons."

"They simply do not provide the same level of correctional services, programs, and resources; they do not save substantially on costs; and as noted in a recent report by the Department's Office of Inspector General, they do not maintain the same level of safety and security," Yates wrote.

This really took me by surprise; I had thought this was beyond hope. The article doesn't mention my main beef with private prisons though, which would be the incentive for those profiting to lobby for and otherwise encourage increased jail time for more people, including making more things illegal (war on drugs), and increased chances of wrongful prosecution.

Related Coverage:

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/20880-for-profit-prisons-eight-statistics-that-show-the-problems
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-lotke/the-real-problem-with-pri_b_8279488.html
https://www.aclu.org/blog/private-prisons-are-problem-not-solution

[Continues...]

U.S. Begins Phase-out of Private Prisons

A memorandum (PDF version) (plain text version fraught with errors) from the deputy attorney-general of the U.S. Department of Justice to the acting director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons asks for "help in beginning the process of reducing—and ultimately ending—[the] use of privately operated prisons." This is to be done as contracts with private prison operators come up for renewal: the services contracted for are to be lessened, or the contracts are to be allowed to expire. According to the memo:

[...] the Bureau is already taking steps in this direction. Three weeks ago, the Bureau declined to renew a contract for approximately 1,200 beds. Today, concurrent with the release of this memo, the Bureau is amending an existing contract solicitation to reduce an upcoming contract award from a maximum of 10,800 beds to a maximum of 3,600.

The memo follows a report (PDF) released this month by the Department of Justice's inspector-general, which said

Our analysis included data from FYs 2011 through 2014 in eight key categories: (1) contraband, (2) reports of incidents, (3) lockdowns, (4) inmate discipline, (5) telephone monitoring, (6) selected grievances, (7) urinalysis drug testing, and (8) sexual misconduct. With the exception of fewer incidents of positive drug tests and sexual misconduct, the contract prisons had more incidents per capita than the BOP institutions in all of the other categories of data we examined. [...] Contract prisons [...] had higher rates of assaults, both by inmates on other inmates and by inmates on staff. [...] the BOP still must improve its oversight of contract prisons to ensure that federal inmates' rights and needs are not placed at risk when they are housed in contract prisons.

On the day of the release of the memo, trading in the stocks of two of the three prison operators was temporarily halted due to declines in their prices.

Related Coverage:
Reason blog about inspector-general's report
The Atlantic about inspector-general's report
Washington Post
Reuters
BBC News
Los Angeles Times
Mother Jones
Atlanta Black Star
The Guardian
Esquire
U.S. News & World Report
Time
ABC News
NPR
USA Today
Toronto Star

Further reading:


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday August 19 2016, @05:41PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 19 2016, @05:41PM (#390181) Journal

    Except, there have been prisons that have been ordered to release prisoners due to overcrowding. The prisons and the courts have to get together, and just decide which prisoners really aren't dangerous, and turn them loose. If there are unlimited beds available from private contractors, then there is no limit to the number of people who can be incarcerated.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday August 19 2016, @09:33PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday August 19 2016, @09:33PM (#390302) Homepage

    This happened in California awhile back, when due to prison overcrowding non-violent prisoners were released to the city jails with the result of -- wait for it, -- that's right, overcrowding the city jails!

    And some city jails are worse than prison with regard to things like mold and communicable diseases, even if there are overall less violent people crammed into them.