Paraphrasing an article by Time Magazine's Joel Stein:
The Internet's personality has changed -- once it was like a geek with lofty ideals about the free flow of information. Now the web is a sociopath with Asperger's. [ Submitter's note: the "Sociopath with Asperger's" comment is not my addition, but a verbatim phrase in the source article ]
The people who relish their online freedom to act under influence of the online disinhibition effect are called "trolls." Trolling is, overtly, a political fight; but it has become the main tool of the alt-right, an Internet-grown reactionary movement that works for men's rights and against immigration. They derisively call their adversaries "social justice warriors" and believe that liberal interest groups purposely exploit their weaknesses to gain pity, which allows them to control the leverage of political power.
When sites are overrun by trolls, they drown out the voices of women, ethic and religious minorities, gays -- anyone who might feel vulnerable. The alt-right argues that if you can't handle opprobrium, you should just turn off your computer. But that's arguing against self-expression, something antithetical to the original values of the Internet.
The article closes with a description of an exchange between Stein and a detractor. In meeting the detractor in real-life, he was surprised by her lack of bravado, to which she responds, "The Internet is the realm of the coward. These are people who are all sound and no fury."
Stein ruminates in response, "Maybe. But maybe, in the information age, sound is as destructive as fury."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 20 2016, @07:19AM
Seems to me that at best the two are orthogonal and that in practice being a hacker blinds you to how people (and especially groups of people) work because humans are all analog and fuzzy logic which is the opposite of computer systems.
I don't think so, unless someone goes around treating humans like computers. You could probably find people who appear to be like that in some insignificant aspect, but it would just be pure hyperbole.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 20 2016, @01:24PM
> I don't think so, unless someone goes around treating humans like computers.
It isn't about "treating humans like computers" it is about developing an understanding of the human condition. Hacking does nothing to increase that understanding. Unlike, say, being a reporter where your entire job is nothing but reporting on various aspects of the human condition. Practice makes perfect, and hacking provides zero practice.