SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
[...] It is clear that a significant minority of British drivers put their time and their 'needs' above the safety of other road users and pedestrians. In a few decades, the driverless car will be perfected and the driven car must be made obsolete, preferably by law.
Until then the Government and the insurance industry should take radical steps to help residents of rural and urban communities reclaim their neighbourhoods from the lorries, the lunatics - and those Great British Motorists who like toddlers think they can do what they like, and explode with rage and indignation when questioned about it.
Black boxes compulsory in every vehicle, with improved technology that detects speed limit breaking and careless or aggressive driving.
Insurance companies encouraged to hike premiums immediately and punitively as bad driving is revealed.
Insurance companies obliged to hand over to DVLA and / or police all data that reveals traffic offences and dangerous driving.
Legal framework to allow prosecution and driving bans relating to offences revealed by black boxes.
Legal changes to encourage use of dashcam / helmet-cam / CCTV evidence to prosecute motorists.
Comprehensive review of 30mph speed limits, with local consultations on which should be lowered to 20mph.
Limit revs to 3,000rpm on all vehicles - as condition of passing MOT - to cut noise and dangerous acceleration.
Funding for technology that will limit all vehicles automatically to the local speed limit (and in the case of national speed limits, a safe speed for the road conditions); and will prevent heavy goods vehicles from using inappropriate rural and urban roads.
Source: This is Money
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 21 2016, @09:18PM
I think driverless cars should be mandatory, but no monitored Orwellian dystopia, please.
Translation: Other people's rights should be trampled to make my life easier, but touch something I care about then you're a dictator.
(Score: 2) by Subsentient on Monday August 22 2016, @04:10PM
That logic doesn't add up. I want driverless cars for the sake of safety. Driverless cars eliminate much of the need for spying. It's not optimal, but it's preferable to spying.
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." -Jiddu Krishnamurti
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday August 22 2016, @05:56PM
You underestimate how many reasons they can come up with for spying.
Hey, you know what would be even safer than driverless cars? Banning cars entirely!
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"