Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday August 21 2016, @10:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the making-a-buck-developing-free-software dept.

InfoWorld reports

MariaDB Corp. has announced that release 2.0 of its MaxScale database proxy software is henceforth no longer open source. The organization has made it source-available under a proprietary license that promises each release will eventually become open source once it's out of date.

MaxScale is at the pinnacle of MariaDB Corp.'s monetization strategy--it's the key to deploying MariaDB databases at scale. The thinking seems to be that making it mandatory to pay for a license will extract top dollar from deep-pocketed corporations that might otherwise try to use it free of charge. This seems odd for a company built on MariaDB, which was originally created to liberate MySQL from the clutches of Oracle.

The license in question, the Business Source License, was devised by MySQL creator Michael "Monty" Widenius in 2013. It allows use for evaluation and sets a date when the source code will be placed under the GPL, but it's explicitly proprietary in pursuit of commercial ends.

Monty blogs

Here is a statement from a large software company when I asked them to support MariaDB development with financial support:

As you may remember, we're a fairly traditional and conservative company. A donation from us would require feature work in exchange for the donation. Unfortunately, I cannot think of a feature that I would want developed that we would be willing to pay for this year.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Monday August 22 2016, @03:32PM

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Monday August 22 2016, @03:32PM (#391685)

    Sounds like the build chain for a previous job. "If you can take the source and figure out how to build it... you're hired!"

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Tuesday August 23 2016, @07:56AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday August 23 2016, @07:56AM (#392027) Journal
    There are some open source projects like this too. Travis-CI, for example, comes with a warning that you may have access to the code, but they doubt that anyone outside of their company can get it to build. The situation with Windows is different though: the source license doesn't actually come with everything needed to build. Some parts are not owned by Microsoft and aren't included and you can't build a working system without these (I think that they also don't include any of the build files, but these at least are replaceable).
    --
    sudo mod me up
    • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday August 24 2016, @03:14PM

      by nitehawk214 (1304) on Wednesday August 24 2016, @03:14PM (#392598)

      It is somewhat ironic that a continuous integration product has a obfuscated build chain.

      --
      "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh