Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 22 2016, @01:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the goes-for-moons,-too? dept.

A Yale researcher has published a study that suggests that because the presumed "self-regulating mechanism" for planetary internal temperature does not exist, the distance at which an exoplanet orbits its star might not matter as much as random factors such as giant impacts during the formation of the planet:

A new study, appearing in the journal Science Advances on Aug. 19, suggests that simply being in the habitable zone isn't sufficient to support life. A planet also must start with an internal temperature that is just right.

"If you assemble all kinds of scientific data on how Earth has evolved in the past few billion years and try to make sense out of them, you eventually realize that mantle convection is rather indifferent to the internal temperature," said Jun Korenaga, author of the study and professor of geology and geophysics at Yale. Korenaga presents a general theoretical framework that explains the degree of self-regulation expected for mantle convection and suggests that self-regulation is unlikely for Earth-like planets.

"The lack of the self-regulating mechanism has enormous implications for planetary habitability," Korenaga said. "Studies on planetary formation suggest that planets like Earth form by multiple giant impacts, and the outcome of this highly random process is known to be very diverse." Such diversity of size and internal temperature would not hamper planetary evolution if there was self-regulating mantle convection, Korenaga said. "What we take for granted on this planet, such as oceans and continents, would not exist if the internal temperature of Earth had not been in a certain range, and this means that the beginning of Earth's history cannot be too hot or too cold."

Can mantle convection be self-regulated? (open, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1601168)

[More..]

From the paper:

However, the overall effect of increasing planetary mass remains to reduce the magnitude of the Tozer number [ratio of the thermal adjustment rate over the decay constant], and if plate tectonics on Earth cannot achieve thermal equilibrium, then it would be more unlikely for super-Earths. Deviation from thermal equilibrium would be even more pronounced for the case of stagnant lid convection. A lower Tozer number also means a longer e-folding time scale (Fig. 3C), indicating that how a planet forms in the first few tens of million years could have a profound impact on its subsequent evolution over a few billion years. Parameterized convection models with the effect of mantle melting suggest that the influence of initial conditions on present-day observables is significant even for planets smaller than Earth (48).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday August 22 2016, @03:44PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday August 22 2016, @03:44PM (#391691) Journal

    Life in a subsurface liquid ocean is not considered habitable. It's more like, "holy shit did we just find microbes?"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstellar_habitable_zone [wikipedia.org]

    In astronomy and astrobiology, the circumstellar habitable zone (CHZ), or simply the habitable zone, is the range of orbits around a star within which a planetary surface can support liquid water given sufficient atmospheric pressure.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2