Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday August 22 2016, @04:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the taking-a-cut dept.

Republican Governor Charlie Baker signed the nickel fee into law this month as part of a sweeping package of regulations for the industry.

Ride services are not enthusiastic about the fee. "I don't think we should be in the business of subsidizing potential competitors," said Kirill Evdakov, the chief executive of Fasten, a ride service that launched in Boston last year and also operates in Austin, Texas.

Some taxi owners wanted the law to go further, perhaps banning the start-up competitors unless they meet the requirements taxis do, such as regular vehicle inspection by the police.

"They've been breaking the laws that are on the books, that we've been following for many years," said Larry Meister, manager of the Boston area's Independent Taxi Operator's Association.

The law levies a 20-cent fee in all, with 5 cents for taxis, 10 cents going to cities and towns and the final 5 cents designated for a state transportation fund.

The fee may raise millions of dollars a year because Lyft and Uber alone have a combined 2.5 million rides per month in Massachusetts.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 22 2016, @07:16PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 22 2016, @07:16PM (#391823)

    You're bitching about the taxi's not the regulations they fall under...
    If Uber wants to play, there should be a level playing field. You wanna transport people for monies, you gon' follow the rules...

  • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Monday August 22 2016, @08:08PM

    by MostCynical (2589) on Monday August 22 2016, @08:08PM (#391857) Journal

    They do follow the rule... Except they (as described below) don't get to pick up people as a "hail and ride" service.
    They ARE NOT a taxi service, in any market. They are a better "hire care" (that is the Australian term for pre-booked car and driver).
    So, the rules are there to protect the existing taxi industry, despite the taxis (in almost every country) being expensive, and not driven by particularly "professional" drivers.

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex