Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday August 22 2016, @04:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the taking-a-cut dept.

Republican Governor Charlie Baker signed the nickel fee into law this month as part of a sweeping package of regulations for the industry.

Ride services are not enthusiastic about the fee. "I don't think we should be in the business of subsidizing potential competitors," said Kirill Evdakov, the chief executive of Fasten, a ride service that launched in Boston last year and also operates in Austin, Texas.

Some taxi owners wanted the law to go further, perhaps banning the start-up competitors unless they meet the requirements taxis do, such as regular vehicle inspection by the police.

"They've been breaking the laws that are on the books, that we've been following for many years," said Larry Meister, manager of the Boston area's Independent Taxi Operator's Association.

The law levies a 20-cent fee in all, with 5 cents for taxis, 10 cents going to cities and towns and the final 5 cents designated for a state transportation fund.

The fee may raise millions of dollars a year because Lyft and Uber alone have a combined 2.5 million rides per month in Massachusetts.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Francis on Monday August 22 2016, @07:58PM

    by Francis (5544) on Monday August 22 2016, @07:58PM (#391848)

    Whether or not taxis ought to have a monopoly, there are licensing requirements that Uber and the other ride sharing platforms have been ignoring in order to undercut the taxi companies.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 22 2016, @09:19PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 22 2016, @09:19PM (#391883)

    We should also have a medallion system for restaurants. If we have too many, it would be a rush to the bottom!

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday August 23 2016, @03:27PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 23 2016, @03:27PM (#392171) Journal

      Forget Restaurants. How about a medallion system for Software Developers. After all, they should have certifications and insurance. What if their code were to have a bug in it?

      --
      To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    • (Score: 2) by cykros on Tuesday August 23 2016, @08:33PM

      by cykros (989) on Tuesday August 23 2016, @08:33PM (#392283)

      They're called liquor licenses. If there were too many, places would have to stop just selling PBR and America because there'd be too much competition from those selling drinkable beer to try to edge into the market.

  • (Score: 2, Disagree) by cykros on Tuesday August 23 2016, @08:31PM

    by cykros (989) on Tuesday August 23 2016, @08:31PM (#392281)

    Those licensing requirements are archaic and in need of being revamped drastically.

    The taxi drivers aren't wrong, but Uber is right to be acting first and asking for forgiveness later. They've got the funds and in many cases public support now to really play a big role in fix the broken system. They should take their blows for breaking the rules, but I haven't seen them as being unprepared to do so, and in the end, I think the rules will end up breaking before they do.