Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday August 22 2016, @06:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the marriage-is-good-for-you! dept.

For older adults, having more or closer family members in one's social network decreases his or her likelihood of death, but having a larger or closer group of friends does not, finds a new study that will be presented at the 111th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (ASA).

"We found that older individuals who had more family in their network, as well as older people who were closer with their family were less likely to die," said James Iveniuk, the lead author of the study and a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Toronto's Dalla Lana School of Public Health. "No such associations were observed for number of or closeness to friends."

[...] In the first wave, these older adults were asked to list up to five of their closest confidants, describe in detail the nature of each relationship, and indicate how close they felt to each person. Excluding spouses, the average number of close confidants named was 2.91, and most older adults perceived high levels of support from their social contacts. Additionally, most respondents were married, in good physical health, and reported not being very lonely.

Iveniuk and co-author L. Philip Schumm, a senior biostatistician at the University of Chicago, found that older adults who reported feeling "extremely close" on average to the non-spousal family members they listed as among their closest confidants had about a six percent risk of mortality within the next five years, compared to approximately a 14 percent risk of mortality among those who reported feeling "not very close" to the family members they listed.

Furthermore, the study found that respondents who listed more non-spousal family members in their network—irrespective of closeness—had lower odds of death compared to those who listed fewer family members. "Regardless of the emotional content of a connection, simply having a social relationship with another person may have benefits for longevity," Iveniuk said.

Iveniuk said he was surprised that feeling closer to one's family members and having more relatives as confidants decreased the risk of death for older adults, but that the same was not true of relationships with friends.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 23 2016, @01:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 23 2016, @01:54AM (#391962)

    As is today un-spoken gem of female wisdom: "I was emotionally engaged, but I emotionally dumped him. His money is my partner now."

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 23 2016, @04:52AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 23 2016, @04:52AM (#391998)

    Men aren't wage earners like they used to be. Women are getting the high-paying jobs for themselves. Women do not need men, or your anachronistic made-up quote.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 23 2016, @11:08AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 23 2016, @11:08AM (#392063)

      Men used to marry female children before nu-cuckianity (1850s on) and feminism.

      Women were never seen as good.