Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday August 23 2016, @04:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the trying-to-get-the-scoop-on-what-they-scoop-up dept.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has accused Microsoft of disregarding user choice and privacy with Windows 10. InĀ a scathing editorial, EFF employee Amul Kalia calls on Microsoft to "come clean with its user community" over a growing number of Windows 10 privacy concerns. "Windows 10 sends an unprecedented amount of usage data back to Microsoft," explains Kalia, noting that enabling Cortana increases the amount of data passed to Microsoft. Privacy advocates have argued that Windows 10 sends back location, text input, voice input, touch input, websites you visit, and other telemetry data to Microsoft.

"While users can disable some of these settings, it is not a guarantee that your computer will stop talking to Microsoft's servers," says Kalia. "A significant issue is the telemetry data the company receives." Microsoft has previously insisted it anonymizes telemetry data, but the EFF is concerned the company hasn't explained exactly how it does this. "Microsoft also won't say how long this data is retained, instead providing only general timeframes."

While telemetry data is clearly a concern, the EFF focuses on Microsoft's confusing link between this data and security patches. "Microsoft has tried to explain this lack of choice by saying that Windows Update won't function properly on copies of the operating system with telemetry reporting turned to its lowest level," claims Kalia. "Microsoft is claiming that giving ordinary users more privacy by letting them turn telemetry reporting down to its lowest level would risk their security since they would no longer get security updates."

The story then proceeds to blast Microsoft's Windows 10 upgrade tactics, as well.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday August 23 2016, @04:00PM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday August 23 2016, @04:00PM (#392187) Homepage
    My company frequently has to deal with MS Office documents. We're using Crossover Office (= tweaked WINE), and an MS Office install from ~2000. You may not believe that that works in the modern day and age for processing documents, but curiously almost every single one of our clients, the sources of the documents, detests modern MS Office too, and the most recent version of office they use seems to be about ~2003, so almost everyone's vaguely happy. The clients who do use more modern versions reply "yeah, I know what you mean, here's an export in an old format".

    What about all those modern features, I hear you ask. Well, from what we've seen over the years, 99% of users of MS Word indent using multiple spaces, and from that I conclude that almost every feature since about 1993 has in reality been unnecessary.

    I'm happy to say that we also have actual smart clients who are happy receiving diffs of their .tex files.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2