Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday August 24 2016, @08:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the first-one-way-then-the-other dept.

The Independent quotes France's interior minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, as saying

Exchanges carried out via applications like Telegram must be identified and used in the course of judicial proceedings.

[...] We propose that the EU Commission studies the possibility of a legislative act introducing rights and obligations for operators to force them to remove illicit content or decrypt messages as part of investigations, whether or not they are based in Europe.

Similar intentions have been announced by the UK government in the past. Those are still up for debate but were walked back at least slightly in the face of an angry reaction from campaigners and activists.

The same article says that Germany will make the same request.

Previously:
European Privacy Body Slams Shut Backdoors Everywhere


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by stormreaver on Wednesday August 24 2016, @08:58PM

    by stormreaver (5101) on Wednesday August 24 2016, @08:58PM (#392758)

    On one hand, they've a more desperate and even, yes, legitimate, need for such drastic measures...

    No, they don't have a legitimate need for it. Remember, none of the terrorist attacks were facilitated by encryption. They were all carried out in plain sight.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Wednesday August 24 2016, @09:04PM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Wednesday August 24 2016, @09:04PM (#392761)

    There wouldn't be a legitimate need for it even if there were terrorist attacks that were facilitated by encryption. Sacrificing everyone's privacy to stop a few terrorists is unjust beyond belief, and therefore such a false need could never be described as legitimate.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 24 2016, @09:33PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 24 2016, @09:33PM (#392773)

      This (crazy) idea is from the same (crazy) people that think groping everybody's crotch in airports stops terrorism. Crazy!

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 24 2016, @10:23PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 24 2016, @10:23PM (#392793)

        Be fair, we don't check everyone's crotch, just the good-looking ones.