Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 25 2016, @12:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the subject-to-review dept.

Are subjects passé in comments on the post-social media web? Or are they a valid feature to enable human eye-scanning and relevant search results?

It is the opinion of this anonymous submitter that putting "Subjects are an anachronism" [1] or "SubjectsinCommentsareStupid" [2] is unhelpful at best and spam at worst. SoylentNews has a long legacy going back to Chips & Dips, the predecessor site to Slashdot (from whose code SoylentNews was forked).

With that in mind, subjects are not a vestigial feature but a useful and defining one. It makes longer threads friendly to readers, and separates this site from Digg, Reddit, Voat, and so many other disposable social media sites. Just as email would be worse without subjects, so too would SoylentNews.

Taken from actual SoylentNews comments; cf: [1] and [2].

Ed Note: I'm of two minds as to running this story. This is presented as one person's opinion and makes a case for continuing to have a Subject for each comment. As noted, others do not feel the same way. As SoylentNews is a community, your input guides us. So, what say you? Should we continue as-is? Make subjects optional? Dispense with them entirely? Other? What benefits and/or problems are likely to result?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by FatPhil on Thursday August 25 2016, @03:30PM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Thursday August 25 2016, @03:30PM (#393060) Homepage
    So tempted to do an ironic -1 Disagree mod, just for the paradox that would ensue! :-D
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Thursday August 25 2016, @11:31PM

    by JNCF (4317) on Thursday August 25 2016, @11:31PM (#393239) Journal

    I'm not trying to be a pedantic asshole (at the moment), I just think this is useful to know: Disagree is +0.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday August 26 2016, @09:58AM

      by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday August 26 2016, @09:58AM (#393420) Homepage
      You're merely highlighting how much of a paradox it would be!
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves