Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 26 2016, @04:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the where-did-THOSE-come-from? dept.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/fbi-uncovered-at-least-14900-more-documents-in-clinton-email-investigation/2016/08/22/36745578-6643-11e6-be4e-23fc4d4d12b4_story.html

The FBI's year-long investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server uncovered 14,900 emails and documents from her time as secretary of state that had not been disclosed by her attorneys, and a federal judge on Monday pressed the State Department to begin releasing emails sooner than mid-October as it planned.

Justice Department lawyers said last week that the State Department would review and turn over Clinton's work-related emails to a conservative legal group. The records are among "tens of thousands" of documents found by the FBI in its probe and turned over to the State Department, Justice Department attorney Lisa Ann Olson said Monday in court.

The 14,900 Clinton documents are nearly 50 percent more than the roughly 30,000 emails that Clinton's lawyers deemed work-related and returned to the department in December 2014.

Lawyers for the State Department and Judicial Watch, the legal group, are negotiating a plan for the release of the emails in a civil public records lawsuit before U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg of Washington.

In a statement after a hearing at the U.S. district courthouse in Washington, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said the group was pleased that Boasberg rejected the department's proposal to begin releasing documents weekly on Oct. 14, ordering it instead to prioritize Clinton's emails and to return to court Sept. 22 with a new plan.

"We're pleased the court accelerated the State Department's timing," Fitton said. "We're trying to work with the State Department here, but let's be clear: They have slow-walked and stonewalled the release of these records. They've had many of them since July 25 ... and not one record has yet been released, and we don't understand why that's the case."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 26 2016, @06:06AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 26 2016, @06:06AM (#393361)

    The female dog approved the sale of uranium to a Russian company - treason. Treason is a felony in almost anyone's books. The treasonous female dog is a good match for the treasonous dog it is married to. He sold tons of military secrets to China.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 26 2016, @01:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 26 2016, @01:37PM (#393467)

    Russia is not an enemy of the US, nor is China. They're trading partners, and trade was done.

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday August 26 2016, @04:03PM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 26 2016, @04:03PM (#393538) Journal

      What a crock. "Trading partners" don't get military secrets. Those are reserved for countries with the status of "ally". I'd love to see you in a debate with a box of rocks.