Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday August 26 2016, @09:54AM   Printer-friendly
from the cost-of-cutting-costs dept.

The World Socialist Web Site reports

The management of Volkswagen in Germany, [Europe's largest automaker, with around 620,000 employees,] has taken a hard-line stance in a dispute with two suppliers and accepted a partial halt in [vehicle] production.

[...] Almost 30,000 workers face the threat of forced time off or reduced hours. [...] The company has applied for reduced working hours at the federal labour agency, which means employees will receive reduced-hours pay, meaning significant wage reductions.

[...] Suppliers ES Automobilguss and Car Trim allege VW has forced them to halt deliveries by ending a development cooperation programme worth half a billion euros without notice or cause. Both firms are demanding VW pay €58 million in compensation. They describe the crisis at VW as self-made. "VW was offloading its own problems onto the supply industry" and was clearly exploiting "its dominant market position against suppliers", they claimed. An employee meeting took place at ES on [August 22].

ES specialises in transmissions, while Car Trim focuses on internal fittings like car seats.

[...] The conflict between VW and Prevent [Group, which overarches the two suppliers and others,] is the outcome of the years-long process of cutting costs by shifting production from the major automakers to suppliers. Much of production has been outsourced to Eastern Europe, where wages are many times lower than those in Germany.

Previous:
Volkswagen Sets Aside 6.5 Billion Euros for Fines and Recalls
Activist-Comedian Interrupts VW Exec's Geneva Presentation to Install "Cheat Box"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Friday August 26 2016, @06:28PM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Friday August 26 2016, @06:28PM (#393620) Journal

    But unnecessary ideology in the story is, well, unnecessary. People can follow the link to the full story if that is what they want to read. The role of the editor on SN is to ensure that stories are factual, accurate (to the extent that it is possible) and neutral. The place for discussion about ideology is here in the comments.

    If biased stories are published then the entire site is compromised. We become a mouthpiece for one group or another. In fact, we become one of the very things that caused this site to be created. This is not the place for propaganda, and it is one of the reasons that I dislike many of the political submissions that we receive - they are written from a biased viewpoint. For everyone that supports a particular view there are others who don't. We encourage the community to discuss the topic and let them reach their own conclusions and views.

    We do not tell, suggest or encourage the community to follow a particular political stance or ideology, religion, scientific hypothesis or anything else. If someone can't argue their case here in the comments, then don't expect us to do it for them by pushing out biased stories. Not my job. Not now, not ever.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2