SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Recent reporting and discussions here about "trolls" and the "culture of hate" (both con and pro) have repeatedly broached the topic of what appropriate limits to free expression might be.
Dean of Students John Ellison at the University of Chicago has taken a stand on the issue in a letter welcoming new students. He writes:
Once here you will discover that one of the University of Chicago's defining characteristics is our commitment to freedom of inquiry and expression. [...] Members of our community are encouraged to speak, write, listen, challenge, and learn, without fear of censorship. Civility and mutual respect are vital to all of us, and freedom of expression does not mean the freedom to harass or threaten others. You will find that we expect members of our community to be engaged in rigorous debate, discussion, and even disagreement. At times this may challenge you and even cause discomfort.
Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so called 'trigger warnings,' we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual 'safe spaces' where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.
While some have voiced support for Ellison's commitment to free expression (with Robby Soave at Reason encouraging readers to give the dean "a round of applause"), others are concerned about the implications of his message. L.V. Anderson at Slate agrees with much of the letter's content promoting "civility and mutual respect," but finds the last paragraph quoted above to be "weird" and unsettling:
By deriding "safe spaces" and "trigger warnings" before students arrive on campus, the University of Chicago is inadvertently sending a message that certain students—the ones who have never been traumatized, and the ones who have historically felt welcome on college campuses (i.e., white men)—are more welcome than others, and that students who feel marginalized are unlikely to have their claims taken seriously. Adults who decry "the coddling of the American mind" will likely celebrate U. Chicago's preemptive strike against political correctness, but students who have experienced violence, LGBTQ students, and students of color likely will not.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday August 27 2016, @01:30AM
Trigger warnings are about preparing someone for what is about to come so they won't be blindsided.
Reality doesn't give trigger warnings. And how are we to know what a listener needs "preparing" for? Sure, if I'm giving a photoessay on the atrocities of the Pol Pot regime, I'll warn the audience that it's going to be grisly. But what I keep hearing of trigger warnings is that they get used for really frivolous stuff. It's some sort of lame virtue signalling not a legitimate concern for the audience.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 27 2016, @02:38AM
> But what I keep hearing of trigger warnings is that they get used for really frivolous stuff.
Maybe you should actually look into it rather than take at face value the caricatures painted by intellectual gatekeepers trying to hold on to the last vestiges of their pre-nixon moral authority to dictate all that is good and right.
> if I'm giving a photoessay on the atrocities of the Pol Pot regime, I'll warn the audience that it's going to be grisly
Congrats! You are now a virtue-signaling pansy-ass worried that students will get their delicate fee-fees hurt.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday August 27 2016, @03:42AM
Maybe you should actually look into it rather than take at face value the caricatures painted by intellectual gatekeepers trying to hold on to the last vestiges of their pre-nixon moral authority to dictate all that is good and right.
I have, both direct experience and reading. Is ad hominem all you have?