Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday August 29 2016, @04:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the whose-images? dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

The Disruptive Competition Project(DisCo) has discovered a provision in a French law which requires search engines to pay royalties for the images they index. Although the Freedom of Creation Act was passed in late June, this particular provision in the law hasn't received much attention until now.

Under the provisions of the law, whenever a visual work is published online, the reproduction rights are automatically transferred to a collection agency authorized by the French government. Search engines must get a license from the collection agency in order to index the work and will pay a royalty in return. It will then be up to the collection agency to distribute the royalties to the creator of the work.

Source: http://techraptor.net/content/french-law-requires-search-engines-pay


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by opinionated_science on Monday August 29 2016, @06:21PM

    by opinionated_science (4031) on Monday August 29 2016, @06:21PM (#394858)

    only charging when google get's it right - I'm still amazed at how bad google image search is. It seems to get the first row almost right, and then pages of ads/rubbish/wrong.....

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Monday August 29 2016, @06:43PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Monday August 29 2016, @06:43PM (#394868)

    Google's reverse image search seems to work pretty well.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 29 2016, @06:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 29 2016, @06:52PM (#394873)

      Always have trouble using google for that. I prefer TinEye Reverse Image Search [tineye.com].