Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Wednesday August 31 2016, @07:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the selective-recycling dept.

SES will launch a satellite using one of SpaceX's "flight-proven" rockets, or in other words, used goods:

The telecommunications giant SES is boldly going where no company has gone before by making history in inking a deal today, Aug. 30, to fly the expensive SES-10 commercial satellite on the first ever launch of a 'Flight-Proven' SpaceX booster.

Luxembourg-based SES and Hawthrone, CA-based SpaceX today jointly announced the agreement to "launch SES-10 on a flight-proven Falcon 9 orbital rocket booster" before the end of this year. "The satellite, which will be in a geostationary orbit and expand SES's capabilities across Latin America, is scheduled for launch in Q4 2016. SES-10 will be the first-ever satellite to launch on a SpaceX flight-proven rocket booster," according to a joint statement.

That first launch of a flight-proven Falcon 9 first stage will use the CRS-8 booster that delivered a SpaceX Dragon to the International Space Station in April 2016. The reflight could happen as soon as October 2016.

-- OriginalOwner_ adds The Register.


Original Submission #1   Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:21PM (#395866)

    Brilliant? No. Manipulative and dishonest? Oh, that's what you meant? Good on you?

  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:26PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:26PM (#395869)

    The proper label, straight from the concrete industry, would have been pre-stressed.
    The car dealers would have replace "used" with "550-points inspection. One owner".
    One could imagine why they didn't go for those.

    • (Score: 2) by frojack on Wednesday August 31 2016, @10:19PM

      by frojack (1554) on Wednesday August 31 2016, @10:19PM (#395896) Journal

      Pre-stressed concrete doesn't fit in that same category, Because it is LESS likely to fail the more you load it (up to the design point).

      Cars and houses are a much better fit to the flight tested model. I've taken cars for test drives that lasted longer than this booster has flown before. Factory-certified pre-owned cars aren't always a good deal, but unless you are a crackerjack mechanic they are probably better than Craig's list cars - with or without a Carfax report.

      Besides, we don't know how many components were swapped out on the booster. I'd bet its way more than the 550 point inspection.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 4, Funny) by davester666 on Thursday September 01 2016, @07:21AM

      by davester666 (155) on Thursday September 01 2016, @07:21AM (#396072)

      Less than 30 minutes on the hour meter!

      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday September 01 2016, @04:28PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Thursday September 01 2016, @04:28PM (#396237)

        Low mileage, older owner, hangar-kept, pet-free and teen-free.

  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:42PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @09:42PM (#395877)

    Companies aren't going to hand millions of dollars to SpaceX without understanding that "flight-proven" means used.