Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Wednesday August 31 2016, @07:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the selective-recycling dept.

SES will launch a satellite using one of SpaceX's "flight-proven" rockets, or in other words, used goods:

The telecommunications giant SES is boldly going where no company has gone before by making history in inking a deal today, Aug. 30, to fly the expensive SES-10 commercial satellite on the first ever launch of a 'Flight-Proven' SpaceX booster.

Luxembourg-based SES and Hawthrone, CA-based SpaceX today jointly announced the agreement to "launch SES-10 on a flight-proven Falcon 9 orbital rocket booster" before the end of this year. "The satellite, which will be in a geostationary orbit and expand SES's capabilities across Latin America, is scheduled for launch in Q4 2016. SES-10 will be the first-ever satellite to launch on a SpaceX flight-proven rocket booster," according to a joint statement.

That first launch of a flight-proven Falcon 9 first stage will use the CRS-8 booster that delivered a SpaceX Dragon to the International Space Station in April 2016. The reflight could happen as soon as October 2016.

-- OriginalOwner_ adds The Register.


Original Submission #1   Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @10:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @10:55PM (#395909)

    There is clearly interest in spaceX on this website. I'm kind of at a loss why. You are basically cheerleading for a commercial entity that wants to sell (near)space flights to millionares. If I understand correctly, you believe this will lead to space travel. And more Star Trek movies. Is that it? Did I miss something?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @11:29PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @11:29PM (#395930)

    The real reason, just look at this face:

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elon_Musk_2015.jpg [wikimedia.org]

    Everyone on the site is lusty for Musky.

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @11:43PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 31 2016, @11:43PM (#395934)

    There are no millionaires aboard the satellite.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by JNCF on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:08AM

    by JNCF (4317) on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:08AM (#395944) Journal

    One of the questions is, what is Elon Musk trying to do? SpaceX isn't publicly traded, but some sources claim that Musk provided 50% of the initial investment and has options to buy more stocks if SpaceX meets certain milestones in the coming years. He has stated that he doesn't want to trust the company to be run by profit-seeking investors until after he has accomplished some goals that he has. SpaceX is going to provide private flights for rich people, but that's not the end goal. Elon Musk is trying to colonize Mars. It might sound crazy, but that is his goal. When an interviewer asked him if he was going to be the king of Mars, he responded that he thought Mars should be run by direct democracy. He wasn't clear about how soon Mars should be run direct democracy, or how many direct democracies there should be on Mars -- the answer could be one. And he could, of course, pull the rug of Democracy out from under the Martian people and claim the right of prima nocta as our resident Musky troll fears. [soylentnews.org] And it could be a very terrifying thing to live on a Martian colony that relied on biennial cargo launches from a private corporation; I'm not sure how independent a colony could really be without having local supply lines for the necessities of life. But fundamentally, I think this is why people are excited about SpaceX: they have their eye set on interplanetary colonization, which NASA has failed to make any serious progress towards since the Apollo program ended. There are a bunch of nerds who look back on those squandered decades and wonder why we don't have any Martian pilgrims yet. SpaceX is talking about launching permanent human residents to Mars in 2024. That date might get pushed back a little bit, but it sounds like Elon Musk thinks it's a likely target. They're going to be using a rocket bigger than the Saturn V. We're supposed to learn more in a presentation he'll be giving in the next month or two (I forget exactly when). I can't say that this won't end up horribly, but I'm glad that somebody is willing to roll the dice and get the process of colonization started.

    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:16AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:16AM (#395950)

      It's totally not the fault of Musky that all the male colonists were assigned defective seats which irradiated their nuts and left them all sterile. Musky wasn't wearing a lead codpiece on purpose either. Musky always wears a lead codpiece. It's coincidence the only surviving sperm on Mars is inside Musky's manly balls. Now are we going to start this colonization effort or what.

      • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:21AM

        by JNCF (4317) on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:21AM (#395951) Journal

        Musky always wears a lead codpiece.

        It's to keep Superman from getting jealous.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:26AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:26AM (#395953)

      SpaceX is talking about launching permanent human residents to Mars in 2024.

      You'll be lucky to have the Bell Riots [wikia.com] in 2024 and not be living in a Trump Housing Camp wondering when America was going to become great again.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @01:45PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @01:45PM (#396163)

      Elon Musk will choose Democracy for Mars in order to foster both a Population Boom and a Golden Age.

  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:35AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 01 2016, @12:35AM (#395961)

    You are basically cheerleading for a commercial entity that wants to sell (near)space flights to millionares.

    Are you sure you're not mentioning Blue Origin? SpaceX is a launch company, and their primary contracts are to get stuff into space. Currently, there is no one taking on the robes of the American launch systems. Don't even mention ULA as those guys use Russian engines.

    Honestly, the U.S. doesn't have any other means to space after the Shuttle was killed. SLS will take too long with how it's being treated as more of a pork barrel project. The only entities with launch capability are the following: EU, China, Russia, India, and Japan.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by FatPhil on Thursday September 01 2016, @08:29AM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Thursday September 01 2016, @08:29AM (#396094) Homepage
    I'm interested when new lower-power-than-ever-despite-more-processing-grunt-than-ever ARMs and MIPS and whatever appear on the market and are reported here. Does that make me a cheerleader for the commercial entities that produce them? Nope. I like technology advancing. Launching is expensive, launcher re-use is a cost-cutting measure - this is progress. Do you want an alternative to the US military-but-we'll-share-it-while-times-are-good-as-we're-your-friends GPS system? That's going to require lots of satelite launches - this is good for you.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves