Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday September 01 2016, @11:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the sunshine-state-finally-living-up-to-its-name dept.

Solar Industry Magazine reports

Following a long local--and national--campaign, Florida voters overwhelmingly approved a pro-solar ballot measure during the state's primary election on [August 30].

Passed with 73% of the vote, Amendment 4 implements a change to the state constitution and clears the way for the legislature to implement new tax laws that advocates say will end prohibitive tax liabilities and help boost Florida's fledgling distributed solar market.

According to Vote Solar, a big proponent of the measure, Amendment 4 was placed on the ballot after garnering unanimous support from state policymakers in March. Specifically, the amendment authorizes the state legislature to abate ad valorem taxation and exempt tangible personal property tax on solar or renewable energy source devices installed on commercial and industrial property. This reflects an extension of the existing ad valorem abatement for solar and renewable energy devices on residential property. Once implemented by the legislature, the tax incentives of the amendment will begin in 2018 and extend for 20 years.

[...] The ballot summary says, "This amendment establishes a right under Florida's constitution for consumers to own or lease solar equipment installed on their property to generate electricity for their own use. State and local governments shall retain their abilities to protect consumer rights and public health, safety and welfare, and to ensure that consumers who do not choose to install solar are not required to subsidize the costs of backup power and electric grid access to those who do."

The Florida Supreme court narrowly approved the amendment's language in a 3-4 vote, and in her dissenting opinion[PDF][1], Justice Barbara Pariente deemed the ballot measure a "wolf in sheep's clothing".

[1] Unable to resolve host address.

Previous: Florida Supreme Court Removes Barrier to Widespread Solar Power


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Friday September 02 2016, @04:48PM

    by deimtee (3272) on Friday September 02 2016, @04:48PM (#396693) Journal

    The batteries are the interesting part as I would be looking to use some long lasting abuse tolerant batteries like nickle-iron ones so I wouldn't have to deal with replacement but these add to the cost of a renewable system

    I looked into these recently, and the difference isn't as big as you might think. Nickel iron batteries tolerate abuse and heavy use well, and you can cycle them from full to flat daily, for many years.
    If you regularly cycle lead-acid batteries below 50% charge they will die quite quickly, even so-called "deep cycle" ones. Upshot of this is that you need to put in at least 2 or 3 times the capacity if you use lead-acid. This brings the real prices much closer together.
    Nickel-iron do have their own problems, they need to be regularly topped up with distilled water. They won't die, but when the fluid level drops too far they just stop working until you fill it up. They also self discharge fast enough that a full battery will go flat in 1 to 3 months of storage.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2