Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday September 02 2016, @07:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the looking-for-the-thermostat dept.

From The Guardian :

The planet is warming at a pace not experienced within the past 1,000 years, at least, making it "very unlikely" that the world will stay within a crucial temperature limit agreed by nations just last year, according to Nasa's top climate scientist.

[...] But Nasa said that records of temperature that go back far further, taken via analysis of ice cores and sediments, suggest that the warming of recent decades is out of step with any period over the past millennium.

[...] [Director of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies Gavin] Schmidt repeated his previous prediction that there is a 99% chance that 2016 will be the warmest year on record, with around 20% of the heat attributed to a strong El Niño climatic event. Last year is currently the warmest year on record, itself beating a landmark set in 2014.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by JNCF on Friday September 02 2016, @11:15PM

    by JNCF (4317) on Friday September 02 2016, @11:15PM (#396809) Journal

    Who the fuck cares if the earth continues on without us?

    Lots of people, myself included! It's squishy and irrational, but so is caring about literally anything. If the options are between dead rock or a living planet, I'll take what I can get.

    Bacteria? Better than nothing.
    Insects? Better than bacteria.
    Octopuses? Well shit, their descendants might be able to colonize Mars some day. Now we're talking!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday September 03 2016, @12:29AM

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Saturday September 03 2016, @12:29AM (#396823) Journal

    but so is caring about literally anything

    This. Complete nihilists that haven't committed suicide are deceiving themselves.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:02AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:02AM (#396854)

      well takyon me old fruit, i fear thee is under a misapprehension.

      as a nihilist allow me to elucidate, nihilism only says their is no objective meaning, there is no $DEITY in the sky, no arbiter, nothing, but we are free to create our own meaning, indeed the only meaning is that which we create.

      as such a nihilst would have no problem with "caring about literally anything".

      your in truth,
      ac

      • (Score: 3, Touché) by takyon on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:11AM

        by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:11AM (#396858) Journal

        I'm free to create my own meaning for the term "complete nihilist" :^)

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Saturday September 03 2016, @03:19AM

          by JNCF (4317) on Saturday September 03 2016, @03:19AM (#396893) Journal

          I'm free to create my own meaning for the term "complete nihilist" :^)

          And yet, creating your own meaning for a term without explaining it isn't very helpful for communication (not that you should care about communication, just that I do, sometimes). I don't entirely agree with AC's take on nihilism (I think AC is conflating nihilism with atheism and relativism), but it seems like you're using "nihilism" in a way that oddly encompasses caring. I think a human can care about something without attaching meaning to that thing -- caring is just a mental process, it is the state of being interested in something. Interest is not meaning.

          I also don't think a meaningless universe logically leads to the conclusion of suicide any more than it logically leads to any other action; it just doesn't lead anywhere. Not leading anywhere is not the same as leading to a quick acceptance of death.

          What do you mean when you say "complete nihilist?"

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:23AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @02:23AM (#396864)

    If the options are between dead rock or a living planet,

    What a load of fucking bullshit.

    Seriously. Your response to "we should to try preserve the Earth as it is so the human race can survive" is "eh, as long as it doesn't turn into a dead rock, I'm good."

    WTF is wrong with you that you do not give a damn about billions of lives?

    A little perspective indeed.

    • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Saturday September 03 2016, @03:37AM

      by JNCF (4317) on Saturday September 03 2016, @03:37AM (#396894) Journal

      Read the sentence I quoted again. I'm not saying that I don't care about human life, I'm saying that I do care about other life. We're quite a bit closer to Mars colonization than the octopuses are, and I'd rather we not go extinct yet.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:47AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:47AM (#396951)

        I wrote the sentence.
        At best your response was an unrelated tangent caused by you brainfarting on a syntax parsing error that context should have corrected.
        Its liked you pulled an "all lives matter" cop-out.