Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.

FDA Bans Antibacterial Soaps; "No Scientific Evidence" They're Safe, Effective

posted by martyb on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the washing-their-hands-of-it dept.

DeathMonkey writes:

In a final ruling announced Friday, the Food and Drug Administration is pulling from the market a wide range of antimicrobial soaps after manufacturers failed to show that the soaps are both safe and more effective than plain soap. The federal flushing applies to any hand soap or antiseptic wash product that has one or more of 19 specific chemicals in them, including the common triclosan (found in antibacterial hand soap) and triclocarbon (found in bar soaps). Manufacturers will have one year to either reformulate their products or pull them from the market entirely.

[...] The ruling does not affect alcohol-based hand sanitizers or wipes, which the agency is reviewing separately. It also does not affect antiseptic products used in healthcare settings.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/09/fda-bans-antibacterial-soaps-no-scientific-evidence-theyre-safe-effective/

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
FDA Bans Antibacterial Soaps; "No Scientific Evidence" They're Safe, Effective | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 45 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:28AM (#396935)

    does not affect antiseptic products used in healthcare settings

    Becuz yessir Bama cares!

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   -1  

  • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by takyon on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:40AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:40AM (#396936) Journal

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265044/ [nih.gov]

    This study was designed to assess exposure to triclosan in a representative sample ≥ 6 years of age of the U.S. general population from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). [...] We detected concentrations of total (free plus conjugated) triclosan in 74.6% of samples at concentrations of 2.4–3,790 μg/L.

    What's in your disgusting American body?

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:51AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:51AM (#396938)

      What's in your disgusting American body?

      I'm full of shit.

  • (Score: 3, Touché) by tfried on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:05AM

    by tfried (5534) on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:05AM (#396941)

    Yeah. Because now the addicts will need to go to the hospital to get their daily does of antiseptic. -> Huge profit!!!!

    Seriously, if it really takes an Obama to figure that the cost-benefit trade-off may be different in a healthcare setting, then I'm all for a third term.

    • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:15AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:15AM (#396944)

      Hell yeah, if evvvvvvverybodyyyyyy writes-in Barracks O'Bummer for Prez, he can't lose! Fuck the Constitution!

      • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:52AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:52AM (#396952)

        Soetoro Beamu~

      • (Score: 2) by tfried on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:57AM

        by tfried (5534) on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:57AM (#396955)

        You're right. That is what I am calling for in my above comment, subject to that if-clause. But for extra clarity I'll amend that with "and Lord have mercy!"

        (While the real tragedy behind our conversation, AC, is that it's getting so hard to tell deliberate trolling from honest idiocy. Which am I responding to?)