Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday September 03 2016, @06:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the did-not-think-to-ask-for-training dept.

Politico reports:

Hillary Clinton never received training on how to handle classified information. By her own admission, she had little ability to discern whether a document included sensitive information. And when she did handle sensitive materials, she relied on her subordinates to ensure that nothing important was compromised.

Taken together, her responses to questions from FBI [US' Federal Bureau of Investigation] investigators reveal a high-level government executive who apparently had little grasp of the nuances and complexities around the nation's classification system — a blind spot that helped allow classified communications to pass through her private email server.

While Clinton is clear that she never had any intention to mishandle classified documents, a fact that FBI Director James Comey noted as a factor in his decision not to recommend any charges against the former secretary of state, answers she gave to FBI agents during a July 2 interview are likely to reinforce the Republican characterization of her as having been reckless with government secrets.

Bloomberg reports that Clinton Used Eight BlackBerrys, but [the] FBI Couldn't Get Them:

In addition to the eight devices she used as secretary of state, the FBI said there were at least five additional mobile devices they sought as part of their inquiry. Clinton's lawyers said they could not provide any of the mobile devices she used. One person interviewed by the FBI said he recalled two instances in which Clinton's devices were destroyed by "breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer." The FBI released the summary Friday to provide context on its decision not to recommend prosecution of Clinton or her aides for using the private system. The Democratic presidential nominee was interviewed about her use of private e-mail by FBI agents and federal prosecutors for 3 1/2 hours on July 2. The bureau then recommended that the Justice Department not pursue criminal charges.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:08PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:08PM (#397096) Homepage

    Ignorance of the law does not absolve one of violations of the law in America.

    Except for Hillary. She can escape prosecution of the most egregious crimes against the nation because:
    (1) She can blame it on her junior IT staff
    (2) She can blame it on her own senility

    (3) If she goes down, a lot...A LOT...of other fifth-columnists within the American government are going to go down with her. THAT is the true reason why many are so desperate to see her beat the rap.

    (4) She practiced shitty OPSEC to a degree that left the whole nation open for blackmail. Which is why we have to stop them all at step (3)

    (5) Ethanol-fueled stops posting anywhere because he was assassinated

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Informative=2, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:30PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:30PM (#397101)

    "(5) Ethanol-fueled stops posting anywhere because he was assassinated"

    More likely died due to illnesses relating to his obvious alcoholism and various mental illnesses...

    • (Score: 0, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:41PM

      by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:41PM (#397107) Homepage

      Hahahaha, suck my dick, you goddamn nigger.

      • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:01PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:01PM (#397112)

        You think you response does anything but add further evidence to my hypothesis? Think again.

        You betray more about your character than you think you do with your posting.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:22PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:22PM (#397120)

          I think his response was appropriate, nigger.

          • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @10:11PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @10:11PM (#397154)

            I like it when bigots out themselves. Makes it easier to discriminate against them.

            Tit for tat and all that.

            Also I find it hilarious that you think using the word nigger somehow hurts me. Like a naughty school boy mooning someone. Also, I am neither black or a yank.

            For the record I LOVE that he posts here. People should be reminded how bad the scum of the earth really are.

            If you only ever expose yourself to the intelligent, empathetic members of society you forget what is out there and become complacent.

            So good work!

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:27PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @08:27PM (#397122)

          You betray more about your character than you think you do with your posting.

          Yea, like Milo, he likes black men.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:52PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 03 2016, @07:52PM (#397110)

    I don't disagree with the tone of your comment but, to my eye, you used the wrong term.
    I think of a fifth column as an anti-establishment (sabotage) group.

    ISTM the term that you want is the Deep State [wikipedia.org] which seeks to more deeply embed the status quo and to resist reform.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]