In the time leading up to the next Kernel Summit topics are presented and discussed beforehand on the Ksummit-discuss mailing list. There [CORE TOPIC] GPL defense issues was introduced. Even though Linus is not subscribed to this list he speaks his mind, bluntly. A good read.
I'm not aware of anybody but the lawyers and crazy people that were happy about how the BusyBox situation ended up. Please pipe up if you actually know differently. All it resulted in was a huge amount of bickering, and both individual and commercial developers and users fleeing in droves. Botht he original maintainer and the maintainer that started the lawsuits ended up publicly saying it was a disaster.
So I think the whole GPL enforcement issue is absolutely something that should be discussed, but it should be discussed with the working title.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04 2016, @04:19PM
In essence, it is all that's said.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2016-August/003649.html [linuxfoundation.org]
And it is not newsworthy at all; a common knowledge since GPLv3 at least.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04 2016, @09:16PM
this is the most relevant comment, he stopped caring about freedoms or openness long time ago. Just look how he let that systemd shit poison the whole linux ecosystem!
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04 2016, @10:46PM
Just look how he let that systemd shit poison the whole linux ecosystem!
Hmm, I must have missed the inclusion of systemd into the Linux kernel, aka the only part of the Linux ecosystem where Linus has control.