Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday September 04 2016, @01:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the untangling-the-food-web dept.

The Center for Biological Diversity reports via Common Dreams

Killing predators such as wolves, mountain lions and bears in order to protect livestock may have intuitive appeal, but a rigorous review of multiple studies that was published today shows little or no scientific support that it actually reduces livestock losses. In fact, in some cases it even leads to increases in livestock loss. These conclusions directly counter the reasoning behind the common practice of killing predators in response to livestock depredations--as carried out by the secretive federal program, Wildlife Services, and many state game agencies.

"This study [paywalled] shows that not only is Wildlife Services' annual killing of tens of thousands of wolves, coyotes, bears, bobcats, cougars, and other animals unconscionable--it's also ineffective", said Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity. "Our government should ground the aerial snipers, pull the poisons and remove the steel leghold traps in response to these findings."

The unexpected finding that carnivore killings can increase depredations is likely based on disruption of the predators' social dynamics--namely, by removing dominant animals that maintain large territories, these killings release sub-adult animals that are less-skilled hunters and thus more likely to target domestic animals.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04 2016, @06:16PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04 2016, @06:16PM (#397454)

    The stuff you were using obviously has holes that are too big for the purpose.
    (I'm the guy who has repeatedly noted that things are often given inappropriate names.)
    You're supposed to be the one with the big brain.
    Surely you can think of an effective, economical solution to your problem.
    If you can't think of one on your own, I'm pretty sure that a visit to your local hardware guy would result in a recommendation.
    Perhaps simply something with smaller holes. [google.com]

    a concrete wall

    Sounds like you are the type who would use a howitzer to kill flies.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04 2016, @06:24PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 04 2016, @06:24PM (#397457)

    Right.

    I just need to find the magical fencing wire that doesn't break, change its shape, rust out, and is strong enough to resist attack by hungry critters.

    Here's a hot tip for you: invent that wire, make it affordable (doesn't even have to be particularly cheap, in the big picture), and crank it out by the square mile because you will have an army of farmers beating a path to your door.

    While you're planning this wire, bear in mind that a weasel (depending on variety) can push through a hole the size of a quarter or less, and that a hungry raccoon will tear many holes easily that size in welded mesh.

    But when you have that stuff built, let the world know. I might be one of your best customers.