The closest star system to the Earth is the famous Alpha Centauri group. Located in the constellation of Centaurus (The Centaur), at a distance of 4.3 light-years, this system is made up of the binary formed by the stars Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B, plus the faint red dwarf Alpha Centauri C, also known as Proxima Centauri.
The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope has given us this stunning view of the bright Alpha Centauri A (on the left) and Alpha Centauri B (on the right), flashing like huge cosmic headlamps in the dark. The image was captured by the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2). WFPC2 was Hubble's most used instrument for the first 13 years of the space telescope's life, being replaced in 2009 by WFC3 during Servicing Mission 4. This portrait of Alpha Centauri was produced by observations carried out at optical and near-infrared wavelengths.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Tuesday September 06 2016, @04:53PM
It's not a point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stars_with_resolved_images [wikipedia.org]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by Dunbal on Tuesday September 06 2016, @05:24PM
Thus the "patience" part. Like the patience in explaining that 2 or 4 pixels is a fantastic improvement over one.
(Score: 2) by Jiro on Tuesday September 06 2016, @07:21PM
Alpha Centauri isn't in that Wikipedia list, and the original article doesn't claim that Alpha Centauri was resolved to any number of actual pixels across. Even the phrase "best image" is only from the headline, and news headlines usually aren't written by the same people as the matching news article.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday September 06 2016, @07:28PM
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 5, Funny) by maxwell demon on Tuesday September 06 2016, @07:43PM
Ah, now I finally understand where dark energy is coming from:
Someone put a notice on the universe: "This universe is incomplete; you can help by expanding it."
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday September 07 2016, @08:51AM
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 3, Informative) by Jiro on Tuesday September 06 2016, @09:11PM
All the stars in the list are either
1) Viewed with the CHARA Array, which is a scientific breakthrough for such images, or
2) Very large in angular diameter as visible from the Earth
Alpha Centauri falls in neither of those categories.
If you think that that picture has resolved Alpha Centauri as more than a blurred point of light, I'd have to see a source. The original article doesn't claim this and only uses the vague term "best image", (and only in the headline).
Also, a simple back of the envelope calculation shows that Alpha Centauri was not resolved. The size of Betelgeuse is 50 mas according to the list. The Wikipedia article for Betelgeuse shows a picture that is at most 10 pixels across (and even then, don't assume that each square in the image is actually a pixel). This means that a star would have to be at least 10 mas to be 2 pixels across using Hubble. Wikipedia's article for "angular diameter" lists it as being 7 mas.