Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday September 07 2016, @02:36AM   Printer-friendly
from the transfer-time dept.

Today, ITT Educational Services, Inc. (ITT) announced that it is closing all of its ITT Technical Institute campuses. For most of the world, that news will be covered as a business story or a political one, but I know that for you it is deeply personal. You are probably wondering what this means for your future; how it is going to affect your finances and your ability to continue your education.

In recent years, ITT has increasingly been the subject of numerous state and federal investigations. In August, ITT's accreditor, the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS) determined that ITT "is not in compliance, and is unlikely to become in compliance with [ACICS] Accreditation Criteria." This came amid increasingly heightened financial oversight measures put in place by the Department over the past two years due to significant concerns about ITT's administrative capacity, organizational integrity, financial viability, and ability to serve students.

[...] Whatever you choose to do, do not give up on your education. Higher education remains the clearest path to economic opportunity and security. Restarting or continuing your education at a high-quality, reputable institution may feel like a setback today, but odds are it will pay off in the long run. There are people and tools – like our College Scorecard – out there to help you pick a program that gives you a real shot at success.

I am proud of your hard work and dedication, and we will do all we can to continue to provide information to you on your options.

Sincerely,

John B. King Jr., U.S. Secretary of Education

Source: Department of Education


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Wednesday September 07 2016, @12:53PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Wednesday September 07 2016, @12:53PM (#398666)

    Well, that job was something else. Officially, we were actually providing support for low latency market data systems; Software developed in-house. However, in reality we were doing just as much Solaris/Linux support and network troubleshooting as we were actual software support.

    It's so damned hard to find anyone around here who had the perfect combination of a frightening amount of knowledge and desperate enough to work for peanuts that often times we'd take on anyone we could get, just on the off chance that they'd pan out when we (I) trained them. Of the probably 20 or so interviews I sat in on for the technical part of the interview, there were probably about 2 people that I actually liked enough to give the thumbs up for initially. Of those 20 or so, we hired 5 of them, including my 2. I guess to be fair enough to the system, all but that one moron worked out well enough that we kept them on, but I think they're all still doing first level support except the 2 I gave the thumbs up to. One of them left after about 4 years for a better job, the other one got a promotion to what was basically my "lead escalation" position after I left for QA.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2