Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday September 07 2016, @07:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the all-seeing-borg dept.

Intel is acquiring computer vision startup Movidius for an undisclosed sum in order to bolster its RealSense gesture-sensing platform:

Today, [Intel] announced that it is acquiring the computer vision startup behind Google's Project Tango 3D-sensor tech, Movidius.

In a blog post, Movidius CEO Remi El-Ouazzane announced that his startup will continue in its goal of giving "the power of sight to machines" as it works with Intel's RealSense technology. Movidius has seen a great deal of interest in its radically low-powered computer vision chipset, signing deals with major device makers, including Google, Lenovo and DJI.

[...] "We're on the cusp of big breakthroughs in artificial intelligence," wrote El-Ouazzane. "In the years ahead, we'll see new types of autonomous machines with more advanced capabilities as we make progress on one of the most difficult challenges of AI: getting our devices not just to see, but also to think."

The company's Myriad 2 family of Vision Processor Units are being used at Lenovo to build the company's next generation of virtual reality products while Google struck a deal with the company to deploy its neural computation engine on the platform to push the machine learning power of mobile devices.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by nishi.b on Thursday September 08 2016, @01:01PM

    by nishi.b (4243) on Thursday September 08 2016, @01:01PM (#399133)

    Ok, I can hear this argument, but I would like an example of something that no algorithm can prove (such as if a program will run forever or not) that a human can really determine and prove, not just using heuristics.
    As you are a mathematician (and I am not), you may correct my belief that mathematical proofs can be represented in a digital form, and thus be as understandable to a computer as to a human : if by analysing branches, you can tell whether a program will ever stop, what stops a computer from doing so ?
    We still do not have a proof that P != NP, so I would not call that a problem solved by humans, even if we largely assume this is the case because there is no obvious way to replace an NP algorithm by a P algorithm (or we would have found it already).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2