Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday September 08 2016, @10:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the sharing-the-right-of-way dept.

AT&T is fuming at the approval and likely passage of a Nashville, TN, ordinance that would allow Google Fiber to bypass previous obstacles to utility pole access:

Officials in Nashville, Tennessee have voted to give Google Fiber faster access to utility poles, approving an ordinance opposed by AT&T and Comcast. AT&T has already said it would likely sue the city if it implements the new rule. [...] Google Fiber is available in parts of Nashville, but expansion has been slow in part because of how long it takes to get access to utility poles. When Google Fiber attaches wires to a utility pole, other ISPs must first move their own wires to make the pole ready for new wires. The Nashville Electric Service, which owns most of the poles, must also review applications and inspect AT&T's and Comcast's line work before letting Google Fiber attach to any pole. AT&T also owns some of the poles in the city.

The One Touch Make Ready ordinance would let a single company—such as Google Fiber—make all of the necessary wire adjustments itself without having to wait for incumbent providers to send construction crews. Google Fiber applauded the vote last night, saying that "Improving the make-ready construction process is key to unlocking access to a faster Internet for Nashville, and this Ordinance will allow new entrants like Google Fiber to bring broadband to more Nashvillians efficiently, safely and quickly."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by darkfeline on Thursday September 08 2016, @04:52PM

    by darkfeline (1030) on Thursday September 08 2016, @04:52PM (#399235) Homepage

    You're not being fair to Google. Take Reader for example. Google gave more than three months advance notice and allowed full export functionality. Reader's demise sucked, but you could hardly fault how Google executed the retirement.

    And it's not like Google has to do much to beat the competition, all they have to do is provide a reliable link and not raise the price or slip in hidden fees every fucking month. I'm leaning toward trying their Project Fi, so I'll be able to get a better picture of how well Google does as a network service provider, but really, I'm not asking for much, am I?

    --
    Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 09 2016, @12:48AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 09 2016, @12:48AM (#399432)

    OK, maybe I would try their service. But I still feel like I'm being fair to Google.

    Just look at all the stuff they did recently last minute (ie: Youtube demonetization not to mention this
    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160907/00340935453/thanks-google-fucking-over-bunch-media-websites.shtml [techdirt.com] ).

    The fact of the matter is that Google has a long reputation for making last minute abrupt changes with no prior notice.