SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Airbnb has tweaked its rules and reservation system to lessen discrimination:
Online rental marketplace Airbnb will address reports of widespread racial discrimination against non-white guests by displaying photos less prominently on its website, promoting instant bookings and changing some of its technology, according to a report commissioned by the company. The report, released on Thursday, followed months of criticism of Airbnb, sparked partly by comments under Twitter hashtag #AirbnbWhileBlack about discrimination against black people. "Bias and discrimination have no place on Airbnb, and we have zero tolerance for them," Chief Executive Officer Brian Chesky wrote in an email to users. "Unfortunately, we have been slow to address these problems, and for this I am sorry."
Before the end of the year, Airbnb will roll out changes to its reservation request system that emphasize trip details, reviews and verified IDs while testing various formats that downplay users' photos, said the report from Laura Murphy & Associates. San Francisco-based Airbnb will also expand its instant book program, which allows guests who meet preferences preset by hosts to make reservations without prior approval, to 1 million of its 2 million listings by January. Under that program, hosts can require guests to provide Airbnb with government issued ID or have or a 4.5 out of 5 star rating to be approved for booking. Hosts can also cancel bookings without paying a fee if they have issues with guests' behavior. The company will also implement technology that prevents hosts from booking new guests if they tell another guest their listing is unavailable for the same time frame.
Also at The New York Times , which notes that the company had hired former Attorney General Eric Holder and other advisers such as the former head of the ACLU's D.C. Legislative Office Laura Murphy and civil rights attorney John Relman to help design the new policies.
Here is the report Laura Murphy submitted to Airbnb, entitled Airbnb's Work to Fight Discrimination and Build Inclusion (32 page PDF).
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 10 2016, @09:41PM
It's less the money than ownership. Several of those folks in the ghetto are making bank with most everything being subsidized; they can blow wads of cash on everything but making a nicer neighborhood. Shit on the floor? Fuck it, it ain't mine.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 10 2016, @11:41PM
*bingo*
I think we have a winner. Encourage ownership, and you'll see something different.
Some of the most disgusting houses I've been in were white renters. Rotting dog shit in the hallways. Clutter and mess all over the place.
Of course, ownership only make sense if you've made it to the middle class and have a steady job that's going to be there in 10 years…. My grandfather worked in a tool and die factory from the time he was 15 until he was 65 with nothing but an 8th grade education. Owned a two story home in a small town. Just looked up some properties for sale around there, and these are currently $100,000 - $150,000 homes.
Homework assignment: Gran Torino [imdb.com].
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 10 2016, @11:54PM
Of course, ownership only make sense if you've made it to the middle class and have a steady job that's going to be there in 10 years….
Anything except the tech industry, brown collar work for twentysomethings. Over 30, you're fired, never work again.
(Score: 2) by Reziac on Sunday September 11 2016, @02:16AM
Clearly you have never been to a trailer park, or to Bakersfield, or south San Diego, or the many other places where people DO own their homes, but nonetheless the place is a slum. Explain that?
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
(Score: 2) by t-3 on Sunday September 11 2016, @05:32AM
Saying that people in trailer parks own their homes is a bit much... The contracts to most places make it pretty clear that even if you own the trailer, you can't leave with it, at least not without paying for it again and going through a bunch of legal and financial hassle.
(Score: 2) by Reziac on Sunday September 11 2016, @05:48AM
Not unless they're different from what I've seen. Problem is so many get behind on the rent that the lien clauses kick in (given mobile homes are legally "vehicles" unless they've been put on a permanent foundation).
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 11 2016, @06:10AM
GP here. I haven't been to Bakersfield or San Diego, I admit. I grew up in a mobile home, now that you mention it. I considered buying one before I bought my house, but I declined. (I also admit I'm speaking from a position of privilege, whatever privilege comes from starting from nothing, thrown out of home homeless because I wasn't who my parents wished me to be, and sacrificing everything just to wind up yet another wage slave.) It's the lot rent that's the problem with mobile home communities. Sure, you own the trailer, but not the land. So you pay some rent vampire above and way beyond property tax for parking your trailer there for 10, 20, 30 years.
It doesn't make sense, renting the land only or renting the whole package. (My parents were idiots.) Do you have data on ownership vs. rentership for Bakersfield and south San Diego?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 11 2016, @05:42AM
If your rent is subsidized to $200/month, do you have any reason to own?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 11 2016, @05:11PM
Those white renters want to torture to death any white male that would even think about marrying a girl child.
White = scumsucking woman worshipers. Aka a dog.
Why would a dog care about rotting dog shit?
(Prior to the popularization of the "white race", when there were just european nationalities, men could marry female children)