Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday September 11 2016, @04:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the setting-the-pace-for-usa dept.

Southern California Public Radio (KPCC-FM) reports

California will now be the nation's example for reducing climate change after Governor Jerry Brown signed sweeping legislation [September 8] that will require the Golden State to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below the 1990 levels by the year 2030. The law replaces a previous bill signed by then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger which required the state to be at 1990 emissions levels by the year 2020.

The law, SB 32 [1] also gives more authority to California's Air Resources Board to regulate emissions. A separate law the governor also signed yesterday gives lawmakers more power over that board.

[...] The Germans have a tougher target of 55 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. [California's is] the same level of ambition as the EU as a whole.

[...] The governor had tried to slip into this bill a late amendment authorizing the extension of cap-and-trade but that was rejected by lawmakers and instead the bill is silent. However, the bill could be an important cudgel for Brown in trying to negotiate an extension of cap-and-trade.

[...] implications of the law on employment in Southern California [...] The state, since the end of the recession, has been growing jobs at a 50 percent faster rate than the nation as a whole. There are studies showing that the renewable standards have created 30,000 jobs in some of the hardest hit rural areas of the state.

[1] Main content is behind a script. archive.li handles that.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday September 11 2016, @07:38PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 11 2016, @07:38PM (#400369) Journal

    And if they had already built it you'd be bitching that they built something they don't need.

    You are quite prescient. California did do that via partial funding/subsidy of dead end renewable energy projects (for a small example, giving $25 million to the Solyndra bankruptcy) and they indeed didn't need them. But who knew that California would be just as clueless about energy policy as anything else they do?