Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday September 12 2016, @03:31AM   Printer-friendly
from the here,-take-my-money dept.

The idea of giving people free money is so radical, even some recipients think it's too good to be true.

Later this year, roughly 6,000 people in Kenya will receive regular monthly payments of about a dollar a day, no strings attached, as part of a policy experiment commonly known as basic income.

People will get to use the money for whatever they want: food, clothing, shelter, gambling, alcohol — anything — all in an effort to reduce poverty.
...
But instead of accepting the cash transfers with open arms, many Kenyans have recently been saying "No, thank you." It's a legitimate concern: As GiveDirectly moves into its larger basic income experiment, the last thing it wants is for people to turn down the money.

Basic Income is a concept often mentioned on SN, and this is an experiment to do exactly that. Many potential recipients of the basic income are skeptical about the goals of the experiment, though, and rumors have arisen that it's tied to a cult or devil worship.

Opponents of such wealth transfers argue they lead to indolence, while another school of thought believes they would reduce poverty and directly produce economic stimulus because the poor would immediately spend the money.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 12 2016, @10:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 12 2016, @10:53PM (#400992)

    There are still a few remaining pockets of collectivized farmers in "Red" China, so, yeah, there was some lip service paid to The Proletariat.

    The thing is that the central gov't can overrule any decisions made at the local level.
    This is the TOP-DOWN thing again.
    ...and to get a "voice"[1] in nation decisions, you had to swear fealty to the "communist" party.

    [1] A voice which, again, could be ignored.

    .
    If you were to investigate what happened in Ukraine in the 1930s, you'd discover forced collectivization.
    After the State Capitalist gov't did that at gunpoint, they came back at harvest time and stole ALL of the harvest--not even leaving them seed grain.
    Tens of millions of collectivized farm workers starved.
    Clearly, The Workers had no power.
    That's against everything that Marx wrote.

    Hint: Propaganda is meant to convince you of things that aren't true and propaganda always puts the most positive spin on everything.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]