Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 13 2016, @07:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the better-don-your-asbestos-undergarments dept.

An anonymous poster 'The ABKCO Thieves' writes in about new hire paperwork.

I recently started work at a well-known e-commerce business, which is a great opportunity for me. Only after I started did I find out the full inventions, NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement), non-poaching, and work-for-hire agreement is onerous. It treats any work of authorship during my employment as their property, even if done on my own time and equipment. I can't post the agreement because it would identify the company, and potentially me as well.

Earlier this year I began contributing code to a GPL v2 project that has existed for more than a decade. I want to continue to do so, but how can I without risking "contamination" of it thanks to this agreement? Part of my goal in contributing is to have real live code I can point to, so going under the radar defeats that purpose.

Are these sorts of intellectual property agreements common?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by choose another one on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:14AM

    by choose another one (515) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday September 13 2016, @09:14AM (#401209)

    Exactly - work-for-hire clauses are not exactly new. They are also the reason for the following FSF position (my emphasis):

    In order to make sure that all of our copyrights can meet the recordkeeping and other requirements of registration, and in order to be able to enforce the GPL most effectively, FSF requires that each author of code incorporated in FSF projects provide a copyright assignment, and, where appropriate, a disclaimer of any work-for-hire ownership claims by the programmer's employer

    .

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 14 2016, @12:32AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 14 2016, @12:32AM (#401531)

    My company made you sign this type of clause, and it says that they own any code you write, plus you have to notify them of anything on which you are working. The FSF statement about assigning copyright will not apply to work for hire. I thought about this for a while, and decided that if I want to work on anything it must have a GPL V3 license. I will tell the company that they can claim copyright to what I create, but they must comply with the requirement to provide source code, and patent indemnity.