Three of the four major candidates for United States president have responded to America's Top 20 Presidential Science, Engineering, Technology, Health and Environmental Questions. The nonprofit advocacy group ScienceDebate.org has posted their responses online. Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Jill Stein had all responded as of press time, and the group was awaiting responses from Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson.
(Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday September 14 2016, @05:56PM
Well thats kinda cheaty referencing stuff outside the response and historical.
As a practical matter do beliefs about something unimportant, of low priority compared to more pressing problems, really matter?
Say he flipflops on his position WRT the Investiture Controversy of 1102. Should that matter? Its really important to folks in the field and people who are into certain identify politics use it as a litmus test of who gets to belong and who doesn't. But being irrelevant and of low priority does it really matter?
(Score: 4, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday September 14 2016, @06:17PM
Yes, ignoring very basic and easily provable science is a very large problem for someone who is supposed to be making important decisions.