Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday September 16 2016, @12:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the need-better-pipes? dept.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37364189

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell has reportedly called Republican nominee Donald Trump a "national disgrace," according to leaked emails. The Republican retired four-star general's comments were revealed in a hack on his personal emails. The emails were posted on DCLeaks.com, which has reportedly been tied to other recent high-profile hacks. Mr. Powell, who has been quiet during the election, said he had "no further comment" but was "not denying it".

[...] Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who crossed party lines in 2008 to endorse Democratic [candidate] Barack Obama, has tried to float above this year's tendentious presidential election. So much for that. First the government released his note to Democrat Hillary Clinton advising her on how to use personal email for back-channel communications while secretary of state. Now - in an ironic twist - his personal email has been hacked, revealing sweeping denunciations of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and some sharp criticisms of Democrat Hillary Clinton.

[...] "Yup, the whole birther movement was racist," the email read. "That's what the 99% believe. When Trump couldn't keep that up he said he also wanted to see if the certificate noted that he was a Muslim." But the leaked emails also revealed Mr Powell's frustrations with Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and her handling of her use of private email while at the State Department. "Sad thing... HRC could have killed this two years ago by merely telling everyone honestly what she had done and not tie me into it," the email read, referring to Mrs Clinton. "I told her staff three times not to try that gambit. I had to throw a mini tantrum at a Hampton's party to get their attention."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday September 17 2016, @02:22PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday September 17 2016, @02:22PM (#403131) Journal

    Unless the current involution is part of the progress. Remember that a "revolution" implies the return to the initial state, so those who called the shift in power "revolution" might be playing an inside joke on you.

    No, revolution doesn't imply that nor is anyone's claim about revolution relevant to my observation. The 1848 revolutions were a period of widespread turmoil in Europe very similar to the recent Arab Spring with similar authoritarian governments overthrown or weakened in a similar, spotty manner and the revolutions similarly experiencing mixed results with some anti-democratic ideologies gaining ground and a number of governments surviving the challenge.

    big changes in the last decades (russia and china going capitalist, usa going china and saudi lapdog) did not profoundly affect the system of power already in charge.

    I disagree. Big changes were big and the effects on the systems of power were as expected IMHO. For example, you neglect that China experienced a dramatic increase in power relative to both the US and the USSR which wouldn't have happened if they hadn't switched to a more capitalist approach. And humanity is experiencing a period of growing prosperity that has not been seen before in history.